Изберете држава: |
![]() |
Канада |
I've had a few results that have been tough to stomach. [soccer_team=30150] are probably going to have to run the table to get back into I.1 next season.
Wish you the best. Some are ugly, indeed. I like your 3-3 draw against exceleration!!
Try 4-5-1. You should be able to dominate possession still without giving up so many chances. I just tried 3-4-3 with my RM in a defensive role. I'm quite certain the GE punished me because it wasn't even close.
Experiment = complete.
Lesson = learned.
Experiment = complete.
Lesson = learned.
yeah it seems like they secretly applied a penalty somewhere
It wasn't secret. They said they were going to penalize unnatural formations. However, the formation I played is natural, just not symmetric.
Technically I'd consider 3-6-1 natural but only barely. 3-5D, 3-6M, 1-3F is natural and provided there is some symmetry among their horizontal placement.
I wish they could just tell us exactly what's the most optimal.
Then we'd have too many clone teams. I wish we knew less. Everyone building 2:1:1 in hockey is... well... blargh. Imagine every player and every formation was the same in soccer? Defeats the fun. I do wish there was more flexibility. You can make a fast team and not be penalized for having too little aerial ability.
Exact, Solution to avoid clone teams is not hiding details, it's giving more flexibility and choices.
the solution would be allowing us to use different formations that would suit each team's strength, rather than having one optimal formation
There isn't one optimal formation. What you said exists, it's just some formations are penalized. As they should be, like 7-2-1 for example. The question is how penalized are 3-6-1 and the 3-4-3 I played on Tuesday?
You should evaluate your 3-4-3 next time we face each other
Вашите омилени теми
Најнови постови