Изберете држава: |
![]() |
САД |
Thanks, but I would like to know what the increments are so I can set my lines accordingly.
That's the thing, I don't know and I'm sure nobody outside of the developers know the exact rate of experience gain.
Is this true? I play in an especially weak world (USA III.14). 1 team is clearly the best. 2 others are slightly worse than me. The other 16 are awful. If I'm playing all those games as "very low", in order to conserve energy for hte playoffs, am I hurting development of my players?
Not one bit. The only way you can hurt your players training by playing them is by playing them lots. The rate of training is a function of time on ice (more time = less training) and not of importance.
The game importance you play has no effect on experience gained.
OK... your original comment was "It is based on ice time and the importance of the game". Thanks for the clarification.
Sorry. When I said "importance of the game" I meant how important it was not the level of your tactic. Sorry. To reiterate with an example, Cup Winners' Cup Final >>>>> Friendly Game in terms of experience gained
.

MY training facility will be at 7 in a few days and I have started considering about concentrating on getting two strong coaches. I am hesitant because of the daily pay of a coach. Should I wait more till my training facility reaches closer to level 10 and I have greater investment from sponsors or start looking now.
1 question..
which tactic (less player) in powerplay is better against team with 5ppl..
is there any paper/stone/scissors mechanic in powerplay..
which tactic (less player) in powerplay is better against team with 5ppl..
is there any paper/stone/scissors mechanic in powerplay..
Personally, if i'm down a player on the PK i'll play 2 big forwards with great experience and attributes and 2 killer defenseman.
Aye that's right. I think the Aussie GE is more advanced

LOL smartass, you know what i meant
2 "strong" forwards.

2 "strong" forwards.
Вашите омилени теми
Најнови постови