Содржина: Questions & Answers

Because you played with very low against very high and you decided to weaken your defence for second period, even you were in lead.

hahaha ok thx

The team strenght isnt any I should look at or ?

Of course, but with bad tactics you get higher possibility to unexpected results.

It wasnt bad tactics..

In first we have same, and in secondhe has a little advantage. But that should not be a factor who makes him win... he plays with b-team and no chemistry !

20-40 should be a normal result here !

Match importance is also part of the tactics and there is always random factor too.

But a b-squad with no chemistry should in my world never win... so I really think something is wrong.

Soon I dont care anymore....

Tian, you complain too much. Yes, you should have won. But like real life, there is always a random element. In this case, you chose VL against VH, and he outmatched you. If the better team wins every single game, what is the point of playing?

Soon you don't care anymore? Good, then we won't have to listen to you complain all the time.

Nothing is wrong. You just dont care enough, you rather whine like a little girl

I wouldn't have played tactics you chose in 2nd half, if someone was pointing a gun to my head! Plus one can never underestimate the importance of match intensity.

So, whine less study (match reports) more.

In that game tian linked I would expect to win either way with that high difference in team strenght.
So I think its not fair to call someone whining when he tries to understand the engine.

But you can surely answer my question or better you can state your opinion. Is that ok?
handball.powerplaymanager...
Of course such results could be possible if you roll it 100 times. No problem with that.
But if someone plays very low against an even or better opponent he intentionally accepts in advance to lose the game and gets out of the tournament so he never should win.

Well, both linked matches show that it is risky to change the whole line-up in offense and defense, imho. This is quite realistic, isn't it?

Thats not the point i was pointing at. And no its not even nearly realistic. In rl a team deciding to quit a tournament against an even and willing to win opponent will always lose that game

Why scouting conditions not for all the same?
2 teams in the same league - one team per day can scout 3 players, and the other team - 4 players per day?
it depends on what? why is there such inequality?

Should debend on academy level. Scouts per day = number of draft picks + 1.

Does a higher PoE and a higher scouting (on managers) give you a more correct scouting in the draft?

I see potential B, and another manager see potental A. I have better PoE and better scouting.