Содржина: Suggestions

Football needs to lower the leagues to 20 or 18 teams... that's for sure..XD the over 20 teams never work on any pro sport real leagues and even the american style of franquise they separate the teams into smaller conference like you did on ppm basketball... the current status quo is hurting to much making quit and not catching new players.

why changed the fixture draw???(Soccer) this change benefits the strongest teams even more

Why not a RANDOM fixture??, the same in the national cup... must be Random, if not almost always win the cup the same teams

we didnt change anything. what are you referring to?

I would like to propose in football, choosing different make substitutions, if you're losing, or if you're winning.
Hope i was clear.

I would like to see U17 - U19 - U21 - (U23?) in Hockey & Soccer so 18yrs in Soccer and 16yrs in Hockey and 21 yrs have the possibility to play in National team.

Not really, since you already have an option to make substitutions depending on score e.g leading by x number of goals (that would be winning) or trailing by x number of goals (that would be losing).

Maybe the problem that killed the swedish soccer users.... ??

PPM must see the problem..

I did not know you could use the minus sign

It would be nice every time terms of service are changed PPM made an announcement about what exactly have changed comparing to the previous release...

U 23 in soccer it would be very very very smart move for ppm...is ok with u 17 and u 20 but it is a big diferent for a good player to loose so much time until 27-28 years for national...it will be the most strong national tournament after big team

I completely agree. They can't surely expect us to read all the tos to find something obscure that was changed.

There's definitely a huge jump between the U20 and the NT. Many U20 players won't make the NT til they're 24 - 25, so there's a 3 to 4 season gap where an U23 system would work great.

+1, like

Hi.
I have some question or suggestion. Tactics in NT (hockey).

I think the current system tactics is unacceptable for the NT. We need changes it!

Now if I (as general trainer) want play some tactics and up chemistry, I need play only 1 or 2 tactics. And I get 100% chemistry only after 4-5 seasons. It crazy!
But general trainer can changes every season. And new trainer can't use new tactics in first season - he can change tactics after 4-5 seasons. It is too long!

Then, best team have on 2-4 game more than other team. And have more chemistry for his tactics.

Chemistry up - very slow! We need fast up or change this system!

For example. On start season trainer have 300 points for chemistry! He distributes these points for tactics. And play with this chemistry. On start next season all tactics will have chemistry 0.
In this example - all team have equal conditions! And new trainer can play any tactics.

Or delete all chemistry tactics from NT!

Thanks! =)

Agree to that. I already pointed that many season ago but nothing has changed (same problem is with PK and PP tactics). Now when new GM takes national team he has absolutely no chance to play some new tactics as preparation for next WC as chemistry is not working good. He can either use existing tactic or start from zero with new tactic build up.

I assume chemistry in NT works like in clubs, but problem IS THAT clubs have 7 matches per week and NT only 1. Anyway - it is crazy thing that one NT and GM have to use 2-3 seasons to gain chemistry for ONE tactic...