Содржина: Suggestions

I've have already to say this, but Vlady and others don't seem to notice this very bid and SAD problem here. Game should be free and everyone should have same opportunity to win. But if you can get more PPM money with advertising your players, it's very sad IMO. It's legal now, because they allow that. But is anyone other have notice same, and want to do something about it? I think they should set a limit how many players you can advertising in one season.... Here is a link, if anyone says that example they two haven't got any advantage here, so be it... imageshack.com/a/nFkz/1

Edit: Everyone could do the same, but i want play this game "fair" it's not fun if you can get huge advantage to use your credits...

On the Player pages in English, a more appropriate title for the section titled "Fun" would be "Miscellaneous" or "Misc." for short.

The problem is not the advertising, but the overpriced sales. If that was be the case, anyone should report them, so PPM GMs can have a look on it and take measures.

Yeah, but they don't want to do anything about it!

10m example is not a huge ammount, but if you sell 10 players with 10m, you get 100m...

If GMs think those are fair trades, we can do nothing, even if we disagree...

They are "fair" trades, because game developers want it that way. What is sad it's that you can get huge advantage to advertise your players and get +100m more money selling bad players.

I have noticed that arena building system is little bit strange, u need to destroy some parts to build new ones, I think it should be simplier, like just upgrading, without any destroying, upgrading step by step, because I think no one wanna to build and then destroy and build and destroy... Who is with me?

Definitely not Architects

It's not architects game, and if u wanna expand arena in real, u don't need to ruin everything, that was built before

Don't think of it as destroying and building. Think of it as upgrading but depending on how big you're upgrading from, the cost of the upgrade is reduced (since by destroying you get 50% of the investment back).

I know, but why it's not just upgrading, in real life, when builders extend arena capacity, they don't ruin early seats or something. Just saying, that just upgrade would be much better, even if 50prc is back. Or do you like current system more?

It really makes no difference, it is more a naming thing. I perhaps is a manifestation on how the code is or something, I don't know. Could it be different? Sure. Is it a big deal? No sir

It's just time wasting thing, u wait 10 days then u ruin, then again u wait 10days without any earrings. Anyway, there should be something like a vote, to make game comfortable for most players. I think it would be the fairest way.

Ok, one mroe sugession, or even note. I didn't saw any fatigue influence to players here, the players which play 40minute a game, play even better then my fresh starting lineup at the end of the match, and I saw it 3rd time in season. Anyone else noted this 'strange thing' ?

Same here. Fatigue should definetely be increased. In Basketball its crucial having a good bench since game is very intense. But today the way the engine calculates a good bench is useless.