Време:
Одјавете се
Содржина: Project Players in Action
Here's all my buys, judge for yourself. (posted onto other website cause here it would be too long
)
| Изберете држава: |
|
Канада |
pastebin.com/1ka3vLMK
Here's all my buys, judge for yourself. (posted onto other website cause here it would be too long)
Here's all my buys, judge for yourself. (posted onto other website cause here it would be too long
)
I have to say: 1.36M Bo Warhurst - 618OR, 4th line centre
Damn where did that guy come from!
Damn where did that guy come from!
Thanks for the post guys. Lots of solid buys! Also a few solid busts. I'll be honest and simply say I left them out of my list hehe
hehe
I think everyone has had at least a few busts. I know I've had a few and I rarely even play the market game.
Scouting - check.
I bought my 3rd line center for 70 million... 202-100-103, 5/6 CL, 94-92-92 Q.. and all he has so far is 3 goals and 5 assists in 8 games... :/
That's not bad! My top player, 6/6 18 years old, 740OR, Built like:
D - 86/83
O - 215/89
S - 75/59
P - 161/99
T - 130/95
Has, wait for it... 3 pts in 16 games despite playing with a sniper 200+ shot and another playmaker (106S, 115P, 106T). Oh well... at least this guy was free
D - 86/83
O - 215/89
S - 75/59
P - 161/99
T - 130/95
Has, wait for it... 3 pts in 16 games despite playing with a sniper 200+ shot and another playmaker (106S, 115P, 106T). Oh well... at least this guy was free
Do you find that it's worth it to have your secondary attributes so high? I've built all my players to a 2-1-1 thinking it was the best solution
personally I find that following a strict 2-1-1 ratio gives the best results. but not everyone likes to do that.
2:1:1 builds OTS stars the fastest. However it is not necessarily ideal. More tech means more PPs and more passing means the shot is more likely to go in for example. Also, salary varies with the highest attribute. 2:1:1 players cost more per OR than say 4:3:2 or players with higher secondaries. Are they better? By means of OTS yes. By means of results.... I don't believe so.
Yeah, before I knew about the build ratios and stuff, and in pre-beta, even in other hockey manager games, I'd build to a 4-3-2ish, but I guess now a lot of people are just trying to find the perfect way to beat the PPM system, seems like that's been the case.
2:1:1 robots are my pet peeve. Scout any player on my team and you'll find they aren't 2:1:1. There are some goalies who are, sure, but my starter is not. All players in my lineup have a different ratio too. Heck, I'm so foolish to even train defence on my forwards!
Don't scout my team then... I don't have a player who isn't 2:1:1... Other thing I was wondering, is it worth it to train an excessive amount of shooting, say 1:1 with primary, but not have nearly the same technique to back it up?
I do. All my wingers range from 75% to 125% of primary. Most are 100%. Tech ranges from 50-75% as well. I stayed in I.1 last year alone on shooting, tech and goaltending.
Вашите омилени теми
Најнови постови
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Сите права се задржани
Контакт - Бизнис услови - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Мапа на сајтот
Рекламирање на PowerPlay Manager - Постанете наш партнер!
Партнери: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 218ms / php: 148ms / db: 70ms ]
Web server: WB1
Контакт - Бизнис услови - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Мапа на сајтот
Рекламирање на PowerPlay Manager - Постанете наш партнер!
Партнери: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 218ms / php: 148ms / db: 70ms ]
Web server: WB1