Содржина: Национален отбор - до 19 години

Genko Zahariev-He must be a guard

of course he must be SG, but he isnt. If he will gain enough agr. and jump skils till WC I use him in SG position. But even then he can not overtake other SG. Even Kosta Angelov will improve his skilset, who has less problematic points. Yes Zahariev is more useful( like Rangelov)in next NT level, than Angelov. But if we want get in WC we need good performance now. However, Rangelov and Zahariev get a lot NT trainig bonuses.

Ok. with PG is bad. I will look at the opportunity some SG retrain in PG position.

P.S. I dont plan take Ivan Ilchev in team

with Uzunov and Yorgov I make conlusions looking at these players skillsets. At this Moment Yorgov looks like more PF than C. Uzunov contrariwise.
If team want good results, it needs strong and balanced C and PF position.
I think that next season is better have 2 strong C, than 1 - so with Iliv my choise will be Uzunov, because he need less work to make good C than Yorgov. And Yorgov -less work to make PF than Uzunov.

Dominum Canis candidate again

This is question?
I want candidate, but it depends what happens in Latvia election.

No, this is an invitation,because our professors have no courage to stand on this post

Thanks for that trust.
Ill apply for election. But if my home country National teams after elections will be in "danger" I will refuse the application here. You all need be more courageous. In this situation I can help with assistance.

For Bulgarian U19 first stage is completed. Qualification we will end at 3rd place with 5-3. There is no big difference 2nd or 3rd place. Before tournament I plan play some games with 18y players to give them experience and gain chemistry for next season. Results was good and I play 2 games with younger players.

I am very grateful to all managers who help me and train players according to my instructions. You all are best.

Next week we start play at WC. I can express my hope that we will achieve the best possible result - Play Off stage.

To WC goes 15 players and about 2 of them will be hard decisions - next season prospects or strenght this season PF3 and C3 positions

PG
Alurkov
Mitev
Zahariev

SG
Angelov
Rangelov
Naydenov

SF
Dabchev
Venkov
Malinov/Zhivkov

PF
Dobrev
Saramehed
Brusev

C
Paspelev
Iliev
Trichov/Yorgov

Yes, this is understandable. Your country is first.Maybe,I will take the team

Next season roster in my opinion (next season teams weakest sides will be entire SF position and PG2):

PG

Ivan Mitev Best PG, but need training focus on blocking skill
Radoslav Germanov He and next 2 PG are similar, but Germanov advance is experience and chemsitry. But at this moment isnt clear who will be PG2.
Levent Ankov
Velislav Katzarov
In season 20 PG position will be better than this season.

SG

Tzeko Naydenov will be player with highest OR
Vasil Atanasov
Ivan Ilchev
Valentin Panov
Lyusi Toshev


SF

Zlatan Zhivkov
Nikola Atanasov need hard core training for speed
Iliyan Tzvetkov
Vasil Prokopiev


PF

Dorislav Brusev
Tzvetan Beshovishki
Radostin Yanev
Kurti Tabov
Plamen Lozanov
Lyubomir Isakov

C
Tzvetan Iliev
Nikola Yorgov
Angel Uzunov
Stavri Chachulov
Plamen Dimitrov

We are ready for WC group stage.
Our opponents is strong. If we look at game rating we have 5th/6th . But difference isnt very big. So, we have some chances to reach Playoff stage. I will fight for at least 3 wins.

We have a chance to continue the playoffs.Good luck Canis

Some posts above I write a list of possible players in WC. I had 2 pairs of players for which I need made decision.

SF3 will be Zhivkov. I choose him for the future - next season he will be SF1. Of course Malinov have little bit higher game rating and higher potential for last games in this season, but we need him If Dabchev or Venkov will be injured. I hope this will not happen and I am ready to risk for a better future.

C3 will be Trichov, because C and PF often get fouled out. And there need strongest players.

But joyful message is - to WC goes all next season starters.

From U17 come good centur's

yes, they will be good. Especially 2.20 Giant

Yesterday we play against Finland. I play with lowest game importance. I think if we concentrate energy on weakest opponents, not all of them, at end we have biggest chance get 2-3 wins.
Game scenario was interesting. In first half our players play outstanding, but in second half shooting percentage drop dramatically. Maybe reason was shooting preference change.
Today my feeling is - what happens if we play another way. But I have noticed, sometimes if play with lowest game importance part of game looks very good, but result at end is the same.

Other games yesterday was disappointing too. I dont expect at least Greece win against China.