Time:
Log out
Subject: Questions & Answers
I also wanted to talk more about % in all areas, but it seems pointless because people doesn't want to listen
| Select a country: |
|
International |
There are numerous posts by me in this and similar threads. For example, I calculated that home advantage is 20% and there is somewhere in this thread my post and facts about that. I don't need anytime when I spoke about it to present facts as they are already presented.
I also wanted to talk more about % in all areas, but it seems pointless because people doesn't want to listen
I also wanted to talk more about % in all areas, but it seems pointless because people doesn't want to listen
If we talk about possession in whole midfield than it's obvious that away team will have it more because he have 5 players in midfield while home team have 4.
But, i talked about possession only at CM area, not the whole midfield.
But, i talked about possession only at CM area, not the whole midfield.
I listen. You teach well sensei.
RD - 5, CD - 5. to low rating, and he have one striker with rating 17..
So what ? U lose because of that.
Now I don't know why u didn't take more possession, but you lose because 2 rating 5 in defense.
Now I don't know why u didn't take more possession, but you lose because 2 rating 5 in defense.
Old you - never read earlier posts 
I am talking about possession - it's clear you can't play without side mid. - no meter how you place other players you will be so much penalized and lose possession in whole mid area - and because of that you will lose possession in attack.
Discussion closed - don't even try to play without side mid
I am talking about possession - it's clear you can't play without side mid. - no meter how you place other players you will be so much penalized and lose possession in whole mid area - and because of that you will lose possession in attack.
Discussion closed - don't even try to play without side mid
Yap, I agree.
@marissis
he have one side mid, so probably no penalty for that.
@marissis
he have one side mid, so probably no penalty for that.
probably , but itš still not normal
He was under penalty - but he have much better players - and won by luck.
He lost possession in midfield, and in center mid. - where he played with 3 players with 14,15,15 against 14,14.
Don't get me wrong - I think poor tactical solutions must be punished - but not with this kind of blind penalization.
He lost possession in midfield, and in center mid. - where he played with 3 players with 14,15,15 against 14,14.
Don't get me wrong - I think poor tactical solutions must be punished - but not with this kind of blind penalization.
Do you think my tactic today was normal ?
I have 1 offensive side def, 1 wing forward and 1 left oriented CM (he even like left side more) - and lost so much on left side and center.
I have 1 offensive side def, 1 wing forward and 1 left oriented CM (he even like left side more) - and lost so much on left side and center.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 129ms / php: 82ms / db: 47ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 129ms / php: 82ms / db: 47ms ]
Web server: WB1