Select a country: |
![]() |
Canada |
It is too little data to make a statement. Some days are down sure but it could also be your guys have rotated onto weaker quality attributes to train.
Looks like I bought a goalie instead of doing either upgrade
Ha maybe
I just felt like I needed to upgrade. Out of the top teams in my division I had the weakest goalie. I should be good for a few seasons now.
Plus I'm thinking there's a chance that I can promote this season, and if I do I'd rather get a new goalie now so I can get his chemistry up for next season.

I just felt like I needed to upgrade. Out of the top teams in my division I had the weakest goalie. I should be good for a few seasons now.
Plus I'm thinking there's a chance that I can promote this season, and if I do I'd rather get a new goalie now so I can get his chemistry up for next season.
Another couple weeks I'd have put mine on the market at a favourable hour... over 600 primary. Good luck with your new buy!
I think I got mine for a steal. 17 mil for 1228 overall, 92 exp. Similar goalies are going for between 30-40 mil right now.
Who're you selling? It's not Newton is it?
Who're you selling? It's not Newton is it?
Nope. He just signed a 3-year UFA-I contract today. Vlastimil Radosta . No worries. I'm sure I'll make at least *some* profit

I'd say. Probably only around 80 times your investment lol
I could go for that. Got some serious use out of him to. Using him this season to save Newton's energy for later in the year. ***We should move this to a league-specific thread not Q&A.***
Is anyone else having calender issues? Toward the end of May and all throughout June, I have blank spots on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Sundays. When I click it says they are reserved for league games, but being this is hockey the league games are already scheduled for Mon, Wed and Fri. So i basically get a month and a half where I miss out on 3 of 4 friendly games every week.
Is there a bug thread i can post this in?
Is there a bug thread i can post this in?
So I have 2 left wingers and I'm thinking of selling one to clear up some roster room.
#1 Q's: 92 71 56 95
#2 Q's: 84 76 77 82
They have approximately the same EQ% and the same OR, both 16 and 5/6.
Does the 56 make #1 worse, or do the 90 Qs make him better?
#1 Q's: 92 71 56 95
#2 Q's: 84 76 77 82
They have approximately the same EQ% and the same OR, both 16 and 5/6.
Does the 56 make #1 worse, or do the 90 Qs make him better?
Both are comparable EQs but as C/L drops 56 becomes a detriment more than 92 and 95 become an asset.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts