Time:
Log out
Subject: Questions & Answers| Select a country: |
|
Canada |
when new players arrive from the SA do the stars represent scouted qualities or unscouted
Unscouted: best guess of your HR. Increase your HR and the stars will be more reliable.
question: on the best build... keep a player tight, (remembering the 2:1:1)... or just free play his highest att's ... ?...
Not following your question. Can you elaborate further?
sure, take for example, centre: good offense,good pass, good tech... weaker shot, agg,def etc...
go straight out build on his strengths or even bother with his lower att's.. ?
have seen on scouting some of the Euro's where a prime centre is maxed on the strengths of a centre but totally disregarded on other att's..
all things considered, max out the player for his position, or really build a hockey player ?.
go straight out build on his strengths or even bother with his lower att's.. ?
have seen on scouting some of the Euro's where a prime centre is maxed on the strengths of a centre but totally disregarded on other att's..
all things considered, max out the player for his position, or really build a hockey player ?.
Build a real hockey player, always! Players with maxed out primary positions and small secondaries are actually under-performers and will be "punished" by the game engine.
Always build your players to the ratios that you decide to use, that way they'll always be "good" players.
Always build your players to the ratios that you decide to use, that way they'll always be "good" players.
interesting, i look forward to more feed back on this !. and thank you bye the way...
If you're asking if we should train things like Def/Pas/Goa etc. on a Winger, I'd have to say no.
Stick to the 2:1:1 ratio, except include some Tech for the player as well.
Training in everything isn't as good as specializing.
Stick to the 2:1:1 ratio, except include some Tech for the player as well.
Training in everything isn't as good as specializing.
I have heard that the passing quality of the passer is relevant for the goal scorer's shooting, so passing for a winger might be relevant.
I've also heard that def is relevant for a forward and off is relevant for a dman -- who knows though.
I've also heard that def is relevant for a forward and off is relevant for a dman -- who knows though.
I've had good results in training a bit of D for some of my forwards... only for 3 of them, in fact, this is far from being scientific evidence. This really could be nothing but a coincidence.
What do you guys think about training shooting? if it's a high Q atty should I train it be trained close to offense? or regardless train it close to the secondaries and if it's a really good Q a little higher?
i'd go with the second
I lean towards the second, and factor in the Shooting Q in my evaluations to keep a player or not.
ahh ok, I was putting some players shots around 90% of the primary if it was a high Q... guess I will re evaluate and lower that down to closer to 60-70%...
for your interest, 82.4%, 75.1%, and 77.2% are the shot % (with respect to offense) for my top 3 goal scorers this season
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 108ms / php: 64ms / db: 44ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 108ms / php: 64ms / db: 44ms ]
Web server: WB2