Time:
Log out
Subject: Questions & Answers| Select a country: |
|
International |
What? I'm talking about people just signing up for PPM. If they sign up today they'd be 9 seasons and 73 days behind. If PPM was played at twice its current speed they'd be 19 seasons and 34 days behind.
I'm not sure your logic is correct.
"Faster" means faster to everyone, so theoretically a team actually behind 10 seasons would still be behind for the same amount of time, I mean, relativelly.
However, I'm not sure that faster seasons would be fun... We could lose on the strategic aspect of the game with faster seasons and we'd also have less games, with less training, etc.
Unless all that stuff was changed also and that would imply in a whole game change.
"Faster" means faster to everyone, so theoretically a team actually behind 10 seasons would still be behind for the same amount of time, I mean, relativelly.
However, I'm not sure that faster seasons would be fun... We could lose on the strategic aspect of the game with faster seasons and we'd also have less games, with less training, etc.
Unless all that stuff was changed also and that would imply in a whole game change.
Top teams already have 15 level factories, if game speeds up they wont have 30 level factories but new teams will reach level 15 faster.
Max on players attributes, max on arena, max on facilities, fast time would not make a bigger gap..
It would. You can't build beyond lvl 15 but say it takes 10 season to get to lvl 15, 20 seasons in you'll have players pulled from a lvl 15 SA with 10 seasons lvl 15 training. You mean to tell me players signing up now are no further behind than guys that sign up 5/7 seasons ago (soccer/hockey)?
I doubt they would even consider making such changes to the game.
Yes. 500. I've reached it a few times and done a mass cleaning several times... which is a pain mind you.
They will never change this but your logic is wierd. Caps on facilities and so on makes it possible to close the gap, without it it would never be possible.
you can't. offsides are calculated based on the chemistry of opponent's defense and their tactical setting. What you can do, is maximize the offsides of your opponent.
Is there anything we can do to minimize them?
In other words, our forwards can't learn to stay 'on side'?
In other words, our forwards can't learn to stay 'on side'?
no, i'd have mentioned that if there was a way to do it.
forwards chemistry can be also important.. they are involved in "offside" game 
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 123ms / php: 91ms / db: 32ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 123ms / php: 91ms / db: 32ms ]
Web server: WB1