Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
Here is one match that isn´t really realistic. Home match, slight advantage on field and no shots at all. Even lousy teams have some shot wide sometimes...
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
Is there some bug?
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
Is there some bug?
seems like one of "those" days
for example i couldnt get a shoot at goal with three attackers
for example i couldnt get a shoot at goal with three attackers
Cant compare those two matches, because you got shots. You just didn´t score.
But even really lousy teams usually get´s one ort two shots wide (like 25-30 meters far or so)
But even really lousy teams usually get´s one ort two shots wide (like 25-30 meters far or so)
Thanks for your answer, I got other response saying its can not be canceled, but if you put lower offer and use market agent icon again, than you can lower it, so that is as good.
Unfortunatelly I was not online anymore at that time, so I couldnt try it, but luckily someone else outbid me, by just one step. So my money was saved.
Unfortunatelly I was not online anymore at that time, so I couldnt try it, but luckily someone else outbid me, by just one step. So my money was saved.
Looked trough all my 169 mach reports since 12.11.2011 and even if posession is around 75-25 worse team gets at least one shot. But your game is not, IMHO, one of "those" games where you either get all shots wide or opponents goalie has great game and catches everything. I'd like to have someone from PPM-team to explain this...
Don't think there is a bug, just a little bit off maybe. Look at my recent CL match against the spanish champion, which naturally is a very good team:
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
I think it's the quality of the defense that played a big role, for example 7 offsides in your and my match against the zero-shot-team. That takes away a lot of shooting opportunities already.
A game with zero shots shouldn't happen a lot, but it can happen.
soccer.powerplaymanager.c...
I think it's the quality of the defense that played a big role, for example 7 offsides in your and my match against the zero-shot-team. That takes away a lot of shooting opportunities already.
A game with zero shots shouldn't happen a lot, but it can happen.
Ooh, just saw, I flipped around the offsides in your match. Sorry.
Still I think it's a matter of defense quality and a lucky day.
Still I think it's a matter of defense quality and a lucky day.
I was about to say the same, i think these is the best way.
Vlady, is it possible to start U18 in football from next season? Did you discuss such possibility? Thank you for your answer!
I offered some money for two free agent players but both of them have accepted their current club's offers, so it says. Now, I want to return some money to the bank for the credit loan and even though I have a few millions more than enough, I can't.
The explanation is: the offers I gave to those two players are still counted as 'on the table' even though it's obvious they will stay in their current clubs. Why is it so? Is it a bug or is it intentional?
Either way it's plain stupid and hereby I'm suggesting a fix: let the clubs who made offers be able to use the money they offered if they have been outbid or the player has chosen to stay with their team OR when the player accepts his current club's offer, simply remove him from the transfer/free agent list.
The explanation is: the offers I gave to those two players are still counted as 'on the table' even though it's obvious they will stay in their current clubs. Why is it so? Is it a bug or is it intentional?
Either way it's plain stupid and hereby I'm suggesting a fix: let the clubs who made offers be able to use the money they offered if they have been outbid or the player has chosen to stay with their team OR when the player accepts his current club's offer, simply remove him from the transfer/free agent list.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts