Subject: Questions & Answers

But you were better than your opponent in the second match and got more chances, right? You just didn't score and got a red card, too. That's maybe bad luck but has not much to do with 3-4-3.
Rather with the strikers of the team you lost against, which are much better than yours.

i would say more random thing than anything else

for every game there is another explanation
- overall team strength better
- strikers better
- mids better
- defs better
- goalkeeper better
- match importance higher
there was not once same explanation

pardon me, there was several times bad luck answer

Pardon me, but why ask if you don't want an answer?!

Of course luck is a factor, this a computer game. And everyone can have and surely had bad luck several times.

And I didn't say you only had bad luck, I said, the quality of the strikers and of the defense in the two matches are of grave importance to the results. Again, compare the two strikers with your defense in the first match and then your three strikers with the defense in the latter match. Don't you notice a difference? And on top of that, you surely had bad luck in the second match.
That's all of an answer I can give to you - but I guess you don't want one anyway. So I rather watch Barca-Chelsea instead...

im not complaining about match that i have lost

I don't understand why all assuming that, it was just comparative match how once engine works "right" and sometimes does not. From my own observation there are teams that have bad luck more than others, and some teams that have more luck than others. Fact that this will be more or less same after 10 seasons does not help me nothing. 3 years of real life is way too long to see whos right.

Now, Barca has every right to be very very mad at the game engine!

Like

This game will be the answer to all disappointnes with GE

well this engine would penalize too much players in defence

what shows actually that engine is based wrong, every team should have its chance, but based on tactics and players not penalization and/or random

Hahahaha

... we have also observed that extremely defensive formations are a little bit too effective. Not as effective as standard formations, but effective enough to capture a few wins and especially goal-less draws. We have made some tweaks to reduce their effectiveness somewhat. -
Chelsea should have been penalized, too many players in own 16m room. If you want RL comparation and PPM solution

Welcome to the world of chance.

You should NOT have lost that game. You had virtually everything in your favor - importance, home, a stronger team. That result is pure BS!

So, just to clarify - a 45 strength team playing a 43 strength team, at home, Very High to Low should be an automatic win? No point in even playing it out? Because maybe this was the 1% chance loss - sucks, but it happens.

Additionally, I don't see moleman999 having anywhere near that huge an advantage. I think his higher importance and benefit from playing at home were largely offset by his choice of player positions. Nobody in the RD, RM, and CF positions seems like it would hurt a team's chances quite a bit.

No, not an automatic win, but a loss like that should be a very rare thing.

Still, if it were a 2-1 or 3-2 loss it would be understandable. But for a team to beat him by that margin, when he had the better importance and home advantage. It's not unrealistic at all, but still the "chance" is slim. He just lucked out i guess.