Subject: Questions & Answers

100% agree! Plus, you should give manager max 48h to decide does he needs that player or not. 7 days, come on? that is just too much!

Actually its not too much. You are forgetting that there are managers who log on only maybe once a week, some even less. Everyone should get a same chance. 2 days is to short for online game.

It's too much... First there is 7 days biding! u forgot about that? I'm waiting for player 8 days, and still have 6 more to goo...

No, I didnt forget. ANd I think that is ok, I would not change it to less days.
I would however like to make a change that bidder gets his money unblocked as soon as owner decides to renew the contract, regardless of how many days left to deadline.

Most people have other things to do in life than playing this game. 7 days is not too much.

Agreed. 7 days is ok.

I set up yesterday for leageu game my D team, and today they did not play... It was somether random team that i did not set up!???? I looked at my settings and i set up good, d team!?

i agree

Ok people, I have one question for the creators and moderators of this game...

TEAM RATING, why does it increase equally, no matter what level of league you're playing??! It can not be the same thing if you're playing against the 1st league opponents, or on the other side against the 2nd or 3rd league opponents... It's not fair and it gives a big advantage to the managers of the teams of the lower leagues...

The present situation allows calculations and irregularities regarding final team league ranking, which leads to the intentional losing of games and promotion avoiding, because of the easier achieving of the higher TEAM RATING in the lower leagues...

Some of you would call it tactics, and if it's fair and ok, then I'm also ok with it...

I do not object the ones who conduct that kind of tactics, they are simple using the game rules, but I still think it's not the right way and that that should be corrected...

If there are some differences in gaining team rating (considering the level of league) everyone's goal would be the 1st league-no matter of timing, and that's perfectly normal!!

Teams playing in the higher league already get a huge advantage in sponsors and stadium attendance. I don't think it would be fair to widen the gap anymore, lower league teams could never compete with the best.

Team rating does not increase equally in lower leagues compared to higher leagues.

You get more TR points for a victory in L.I than in L.IV.
Even in friendlies, there is a (very little) difference if you're facing a bad team or a great team.

I think you're mistaken... Sponsorship is the main problem here. Teams from the 2nd league gain the better sponsors (not necessarily, but there are examples) precisely because of the higher TEAM RATING. And of course, how can you get the higher team rating?? Playing 3-4 seasons 2nd league and be in the top but avoid the promotion or playing 3-4 seasons in the 1st league and be near the bottom??

"Team rating does not increase equally in lower leagues compared to higher leagues."

If it's the truth, but I don't think so, than OK...

There are exceptions, naturally. If teams in higher league always would receive more sponsor money than teams in the lower ones, not one team could catch up. The gap between 1&2, 2&3 and so on would eventually grow so big, that anyone who gets promoted would get tossed back down immediately.

This ain't real life, where the top teams remain top teams season after season. And neither it should be, that would just be boring. I agree that it leaves room for a little "cheating" by staying in the low leagues, but I don't think there is a better alternative here. There are a few exceptions, but usually teams in higher leagues receive more money.