Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
I like the new Sim. I think it brought a quite representative advance regarding our last season one. The stroger team almost always overcome the weaker (in ball possession and shots) on a consistent basis. Problem is some expurious results are still occurring in a more-than-reasonable ratio. This is happening because the random part on the goals per shots equation is overrated. So where we have to look at is this precise point: do a small decrease in the randomness of the goals per shot relation, or (in statistical terms) its standard deviation from the average.
1. Sure. But you and me are part of the community,too.
2. thank you
3. I am the Goalie. " But changing my mind needs a lot more than some bad English" is not correct.
correct: need much more (and english. Its no name)
Just as a response for calling my english bad.
2. thank you
3. I am the Goalie. " But changing my mind needs a lot more than some bad English" is not correct.
correct: need much more (and english. Its no name)
Just as a response for calling my english bad.

Well - I am not getting from game what I would like. I expect tactical battle - but I really don't see much of that in this game. I simply don't understand how engine works and where I make mistakes or what I am doing correctly. I can't see was something luck or bad luck or mistake or something else. It's simply not clear.
Let's see what would look 1 point game engine:
- Barcelona and Espanol players comes to the field. Barcelona have better players and chance of 60% for win, 30% for draw and 10% to lose. Referee randomly pick one number from 1 to 100. If he pick 1-60 - Barcelona win, 61-90 it's a draw, 91-100 Espanol wins. It's a 1 point game engine. They don't have to play at all, no need for passing and running
- Second point would be to pick result when you know who won game.
- Third point could be to pick scorers.
Let's see what would look 1 point game engine:
- Barcelona and Espanol players comes to the field. Barcelona have better players and chance of 60% for win, 30% for draw and 10% to lose. Referee randomly pick one number from 1 to 100. If he pick 1-60 - Barcelona win, 61-90 it's a draw, 91-100 Espanol wins. It's a 1 point game engine. They don't have to play at all, no need for passing and running

- Second point would be to pick result when you know who won game.
- Third point could be to pick scorers.
No problem, feel free to argue, it´s my pleasure to have such an interesting conversation, although I disagree with you on your statement n.3 ("lot more" is correct and "English", as a language or citizenship, starts with capital letter). I agree with all the rest.

Oh. But me got such unintelligible results with my team,too.
And ask Mickey,if he know about something,too...
And ask Mickey,if he know about something,too...

That´s just supporting my thesis. But the point is: outlyers tend to be more obvious when they occur in the extreme of the observation spectrum. In the present case, the top teams.
Thank you. I am sitting here and grin myself,too.
and your right with the capital letter for English.
(`cause language) "needs a lot more" is not really wrong,but also not complete right,because this formulation is usually used for real things,not for thoughts.
It is impolite to say this at this point. And english people are normally very civil,thats why this formulation is not complete correct.
and your right with the capital letter for English.
(`cause language) "needs a lot more" is not really wrong,but also not complete right,because this formulation is usually used for real things,not for thoughts.
It is impolite to say this at this point. And english people are normally very civil,thats why this formulation is not complete correct.

Depends if you are in the United Kingdom or in North America. Some small changes on the way the language is spoken and written, as defense/defence, soccer/football, and so on... I like my Swiss watch anyway, even though some of my fellow Brazilians do prefer the Japanese!
LOL that was really nice. Bad English Google Translated!
Yes,that was quite cool of nova. Super-nova.
I am living in Switzerland,because I got a swiss lady at home.
But I am german. (little netherlands and frech blood i got too)
I prefer simple english,so its easier for other people to understand.
*soory, Mistah footbahlplajin-inglisch-titschaah*

I am living in Switzerland,because I got a swiss lady at home.
But I am german. (little netherlands and frech blood i got too)
I prefer simple english,so its easier for other people to understand.
*soory, Mistah footbahlplajin-inglisch-titschaah*

I though you were from Germany indeed! Maybe the order of the words in your writting. I am Brazilian with a mother from Hungary and a father that is an Italian descendent. Szervusz!
True. But your the first one calling my english bad. Really. 10 years ago in Berlin, a guy from Texas didnt believed me being german. And he didnt wanted to be gentle: I told him some not that nice words about the USA.
I got a Mother from Netherlands,her Grandfather descendet from France... Abracos!
I got a Mother from Netherlands,her Grandfather descendet from France... Abracos!
Oh,I forgot: He thought me being Englishman. (your = youre,the apostrophs works bad for me on the swiss keyboard)
What you expect is quite difficult to realise,I think.
In my poor League i bet the others with tactics...
and I think, you are doing most things quiet well,even if you have been shooted out of the turnery from a swiss team.
You got quite far,and the swiss teams here are better than in RL... (because of lots of players,especially pro-pack-players and a lack of this xxxxxx TV and Fifa Money in RL)
In my poor League i bet the others with tactics...

and I think, you are doing most things quiet well,even if you have been shooted out of the turnery from a swiss team.
You got quite far,and the swiss teams here are better than in RL... (because of lots of players,especially pro-pack-players and a lack of this xxxxxx TV and Fifa Money in RL)
Your favorite threads
Newest posts