yes but when we set up our lines we need to know who is the player at the point. Is it the player designated as RD or as LD in the lineup?
If one of them has better passing and one has better shot i would rather the one with better passing to be doing the passing rather than the shooting.
Could we have an explanation of which positions are where on the ice please.
Unless of course the plays have nothing to do with which players are where.
Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
I just looked at analysis of past games, so why we have 2 pucks of importance in 1 period ?
And why is 0 percentage given in brackets with PP and PK tactic ?
And why is 0 percentage given in brackets with PP and PK tactic ?
Ok, I got first one, you've changed perspective of importance, it's not bold black, grey and white.
My guess: Very low -> 1, low ->2, normal ->3 and so on.
PP/PK lines have tactics related chemistry. The more you play passive box, the better they get at it.
PP/PK lines have tactics related chemistry. The more you play passive box, the better they get at it.
Over Game summary, would it be able to check which special tactic the opponent has played? ^^
okay, what the hell??? i just looked at the players, and apparently, 5 or 6 of them dropped CL from 6/6 to 5/6 with 16yo!!!!
this didn't happen before, CL didn't drop for 16yo players, if they were 6/6 when they came from the academy, they were 6/6 until they were 17...
did anything change?!?!?!
this didn't happen before, CL didn't drop for 16yo players, if they were 6/6 when they came from the academy, they were 6/6 until they were 17...
did anything change?!?!?!
i never had 1 player in my career who dropped CL at the age of 16...and i've never seen not a single player with 16yo and 4/6 on the market...care to explain that?
okay if 1-2 were the case, but seriously, 5-6 players???
okay if 1-2 were the case, but seriously, 5-6 players???
Your favorite threads
Newest posts