Subject: Questions & Answers

Of course it wont happen. We're all deluded if we think PPM would actually do something like that. But, i would LOVE to see them make it happen, if for no other reason than for me to be wrong.

+100 for HIGUERA and trueblue55!
Starting at same division would be fairest but same OTR/sponsor deals would probably be easier to do.
I'd be very happy whit either one!

Just a comment: To let everyone start with same sponsor could be a good idea.
But then one would imo need to drop the promotion bonuses at least in the first season, too. And then people would complain or delay promotion, whatever. Many such things have to be considered I think.

Can a manager get banned from posting if he displays constant negativity towards the game and it's developers?

They can get a ban from the forums yes. If someone has done something please report to any moderator.

Negativity, no. Expressing ones opinion on a forum is what they're designed for. The idea that an opinion is negative is based purely upon the readers perception of that post.

So can they be banned for expressing a seemingly negative opinion? I hope not, as that would be counterproductive to the very point of having a forum.

If that negativity is abusive and offensive, then there would be valid argument.

Don't like my posts? LOL

Negativity, no?????????? What would you call it?
Let's review some of your comments from the past week on this forum:

"We're all deluded if we think PPM would actually do something like that"
"They don't listen, nor do they appear to care."
"That lack of competition makes the game boring and pointless."
"My faith in PPM is pretty much at zero"
"It really pisses me off that PPM made that change, and seemingly don't give a crap about people in your position"
"and as a manager handball to me is a bad choice."
"People are already frustrated by the game engine, a third sport will just make a whole new bunch of people angry with it"
"LOL @ handball. Incredibly stupid choice of next game IMO."
"My guess is this is just another way that PPM tried to make the game fair for the weaker players. Disadvantage the managers who built a strong team in favour of the newer teams."
"Either your game engine is broken, or your claim that there are less penalties is simply not true!"
" this is a flaw in the system"

Listen, if you don't like the game, LEAVE!
If you do like the game, STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT IT!

You are allowed to be negative, but when 90% of the posts the last few days have all been you complaining it starts to get old. I've really got to just stop looking in this thread from now on because it seems I never learn anything from any posts, it's all complaints about how bad the game is.

TB man, you've been in some bad mood lately.

Point taken. ciao.

when will the club pennants be rearranged?(new situation with countries)

soccer.powerplaymanager.c...

I cant understand this match:

1. half normal vs very high:

possession: 58 : 42
shots: 6 : 3
goals: 2 : 0

2. half normal vs very low

possession: 56 : 44
shots 2 : 3
goals 0 : 0

Not identical tactics in both halfs

I'm having a good bunch of similar examples lately, most of them just changing low to very low -myself- and same tactics: it seems to have no real effect on possession... :-S

I suspect the away team changed the position of their players. Look at the defensive formation that they started with. No side defenders.

btw, possession can be slightly misleading here. Playing on higher importance gives you more possession in Midfield and it also increases your time in offense. However, in offense, it is normally the defending team that has more possession. Therefore, in some cases, increasing the importance may lead to reduced possession overall, because of the increased time spent in offense without the ball.