Time:
Log out
Subject: Questions & Answers| Select a country: |
|
International |
ahh credit tourny's should have better attendance i would have thought. I mean, an organised tourny will ALWAYS bring in more fans than a friendly game.
but then there will be advantage to teams who plays at theese tournaments
what, since when were people worried about things being equal for everyone? 
Yes, but it's a freakin credit tourny.. they are PAYING to play in it, there SHOULD be a benefit.
so you can pay money to achieve ingame advantage => against the principle
What principle?
The same principle that benefits some countries with NT and others without?
We already pay more than most other games for pro pack, you'd think there would be some kind of benefit.
The same principle that benefits some countries with NT and others without?
We already pay more than most other games for pro pack, you'd think there would be some kind of benefit.
the principle that you can not buy ingame advantages like converting real money to ppm money
You wouldn't be buying any "advantage".
The fact is, ANY tournament game is going to bring in more fans than a friendly game. That is pretty much a given regardless of the sport, or the country or the level of play.
So regardless of any "advantage", it is unrealistic that tourny games have no increase in fans.
The fact is, ANY tournament game is going to bring in more fans than a friendly game. That is pretty much a given regardless of the sport, or the country or the level of play.
So regardless of any "advantage", it is unrealistic that tourny games have no increase in fans.
pacman is actually right here. And this principle has been offically stated my ppm team members. Paying users will not have any ingame advantages and I think it is good.
Where would you draw the line for what real money could buy you in the game?
Where would you draw the line for what real money could buy you in the game?
Actually you would be buying ingame money - ticket money.
In that logic we can say that any tournament game makes players to play "harder" and "work" more on ice (because of credit /money/ profit for his club if they win) and in that case energy lose would be bigger than on friendlies... Right? So we should have more money with tournament games, but also more energy loss... If we stick with your logic
Yes. I believe energy loss SHOULD be higher in tournament games than in friendlies.
so you think that if canada play the usa in a friendley there energie loss is lower than in a friendley Tournament canada aginst some bad country.
Well for a start in PPM you don't play national teams, so your argument is invalid.
However, the point is, a tournament should bring in more fans than a friendly game, and the tradeoff should be that the energy loss would be higher than a friendly.
However, the point is, a tournament should bring in more fans than a friendly game, and the tradeoff should be that the energy loss would be higher than a friendly.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 100ms / php: 71ms / db: 30ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 100ms / php: 71ms / db: 30ms ]
Web server: WB2