Time:
Log out
Subject: Questions & Answers
| Select a country: |
|
International |
true, but it's not entirely true to say that every team takes their 3 shots anyway
it works now exactly as in real life hockey. as soon as the winner is decided, there are no more shots taken
So, if team 1 misses then team 2 scores, that's it?
Or, is it like the NHL where if team 1 misses and team 2 scores, team 1 then shoots again, and so on, until 3 shots are taken or until one team is unable to tie the goals from 3 shots.
Or, is it like the NHL where if team 1 misses and team 2 scores, team 1 then shoots again, and so on, until 3 shots are taken or until one team is unable to tie the goals from 3 shots.
trueblue, look at the link I posted on previous page, and you'll see what I mean
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
if team A is leading after 2 rounds, and team B misses on 3rd attempt, team A has won, and won't take it's final (third) shootout anymore
so basically yes
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
if team A is leading after 2 rounds, and team B misses on 3rd attempt, team A has won, and won't take it's final (third) shootout anymore
so basically yes
I dont know how much clearer I can say this. EXACTLY AS IN REAL LIFE HOCKEY (NHL, IIHF = real life hockey)
hehe thanks Vlady
btw... I know we don't say this enough, so wanted to put it out there... but we are incredibly thankful for all the hard work and effort you put in here, and also to those behind the scenes doing all the work at PPM.
btw... I know we don't say this enough, so wanted to put it out there... but we are incredibly thankful for all the hard work and effort you put in here, and also to those behind the scenes doing all the work at PPM.
thanks. it's always nice to read something like this.
But i anyway want to ask. why you guys want reduce counter-tactics influence?
they've got way too much influence than they should if you ask me
Re: counter-tactics. I think they should have an affect, assuming your team is designed to use them. ie. If you have a very defensively heavy team, with solid defensive forwards, then the defensive counter-tactic should work GREAT. But, only because your team is designed around it.
right, and at the moment that is not (or not much) the case
If I got it right, by reducing tactic influence matches will be decided mostly through teams strength.
If that means they should also reduce silly results - ok.
If that means they should also reduce silly results - ok.
It would be pity though if tactic is the main reason for random. 
tactic plays it part in the "stranger" results I think, but that's not the only factor as u just said
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 128ms / php: 91ms / db: 38ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 128ms / php: 91ms / db: 38ms ]
Web server: WB1