As I have heared, H2H statistics are hard to make,
but who knows ...
Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
I think the problem is that match data gets deleted after 100 days. The only trace of it remains on the calendar and the only data there is team (id and name at that time) and result. No other data remains available to make some more stats.
I've made a little mistake. Data gets deleted after 4 months, but the problem remains the same.
the problem is actually that such a query would be too demanding on the database. I have suggested this many times to the developers and they said themselves that it would be a nice feature but that it can't be done with our current database.
Is there a way of having a top ranking list for best league win% based on a teams overall strength vs the other teams they have played team strengths?
The idea being that a team with 100% wins where they are easily the best team in the league would be worse than 90% wins for an average team in a league.
For example each time you win a league match your 'score' for the season is increased by other team strength / your team strength.
Thus if your team strength is 100 and beat team with 110, then you would get 1.1 points. If beat team with 50, then only get 0.5 points.
Could also add in minuses for losing as the inverse. Lose more if you lose to a worse team than if lose to a better team.
Guess im just sick of seeing the most wins for the season standings being dominated by teams in div5.
The idea being that a team with 100% wins where they are easily the best team in the league would be worse than 90% wins for an average team in a league.
For example each time you win a league match your 'score' for the season is increased by other team strength / your team strength.
Thus if your team strength is 100 and beat team with 110, then you would get 1.1 points. If beat team with 50, then only get 0.5 points.
Could also add in minuses for losing as the inverse. Lose more if you lose to a worse team than if lose to a better team.
Guess im just sick of seeing the most wins for the season standings being dominated by teams in div5.
Same should happen with OTR.
Many users preffer to play in lower divisions in order to get a higher OTR.
Many users preffer to play in lower divisions in order to get a higher OTR.
Yep, the OTR discussion has been around for 5 seasons and never gets old. I've often wished i had stayed down in lower divisions.
Hello,
For the football part, I think it will be interresting to have in the "Resume Match" :
The average of the "Total of skill" for the 11 players in game.
For the football part, I think it will be interresting to have in the "Resume Match" :
The average of the "Total of skill" for the 11 players in game.
Here is suggestion about manager history - if some of people will play (for example) one year in hockey only, next one year in football only, next (and so on)... it could be thing of pleasure for them to show history of teams (and trophies/achievements) in manager profile.
There is new feature in Market page: Market Scout. It costs 1 credit to use it, but my question why not make it PRO-feature?
Oh, i can't wait to hear the answer to this question!
official answer:
"because it is too demanding on our database so it couldn't be PRO option"
i don't remember the rest of the answer but it contained what i wrote
"because it is too demanding on our database so it couldn't be PRO option"
i don't remember the rest of the answer but it contained what i wrote
it is written somewhere on forum but i really don't remember where.vlady wrote that
Your favorite threads
Newest posts