
Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
thanks for the feedback - i'll be patient another season

Vlady, is playerrating for goalkeepers and the teamstrenght for goalkeeper not linked togheter?
I see a rating 19 GK who gets 89 in Team.Str
I see a rating 18 GK who gets 91 in TS
I see a rating 18 GK who gets 89 in TS
I see a rating 19 GK who gets 89 in Team.Str
I see a rating 18 GK who gets 91 in TS
I see a rating 18 GK who gets 89 in TS
What? GK only plays a small part of OTS. D, M, O contribute as well.
Did not know that the 10 players on the field had an impact on the GK stat.. seems wierd
Just to be clear, Iam talking about the Goalkeeping part of the ots. For my team my GK had 89, ots was 94. Just so we are not mixing terms up here
How can player A get a higher rating than player B:
Player A:
Attack: 120
Shooting 76
Passing 29
Technique 70
speed 90
Heading 47
Experience 14
Energy 100/100
Player B
Attack: 130
Shooting 80
Passing 21
Technique 70
Speed 102
Heading 80
Experience 65
Energy 100/100
They both played in the same match on the same spot (player A 40 minutes, player B 50 minutes). Player A received a 13 rating, player B a 12. Player B has in every aspect better skills, so how come he didn't get a higher rating?
Player A:
Attack: 120
Shooting 76
Passing 29
Technique 70
speed 90
Heading 47
Experience 14
Energy 100/100
Player B
Attack: 130
Shooting 80
Passing 21
Technique 70
Speed 102
Heading 80
Experience 65
Energy 100/100
They both played in the same match on the same spot (player A 40 minutes, player B 50 minutes). Player A received a 13 rating, player B a 12. Player B has in every aspect better skills, so how come he didn't get a higher rating?
Oh, they both have a right foot preference and played on the right side (right center forward).
Passing? Punishment for too low secondary (what we have since last season)?
one last detail.
Player A had 77% chemistry
Player B had 99% chemistry
Player A had 77% chemistry
Player B had 99% chemistry
8 points of passing that has such a huge influence? That would be seriously wrong if that was the case.
Also, punishment for too low secondary? What's that? It's not in the game manual.
Also, punishment for too low secondary? What's that? It's not in the game manual.
Looking at those numbers makes me think that passing have some (low but existing) importance in the rating of CF ...
It's not punishment, it is just bad training. And what is so huge when there is just 1 point between them ? You cant train just 3 attributes.
8 points but:
player A: Pas=25%
player B: Pas=15%
the diference isn't so small as you can think!
player A: Pas=25%
player B: Pas=15%
the diference isn't so small as you can think!
Your favorite threads
Newest posts