Subject: Questions & Answers

good point, didn't think of that.

Just wondering about tournament qualification. If the top 3 clubs in Division 1.1 also win both the National Cup and League cup between them, what club would qualify for the Super League Cup? (Obviously the top 3 clubs would be in the larger tournaments)

the next in line in the League Cup

Why I didn't receive a pennant from yesterday's friendly?

Because you played against a bot team.

Use a decent language mate.

clip2net.com/s/1exOM wtf? i pay for live not for comercials

That live do not need... I hope this is mistake and I never will see it...

You will see it...
I would have nothing against it, if it would roll to non-PRO users or even to PRO owners that open live more than 45 or so seconds before the match.
But it rolls every time I open live and it's not acceptable.

Yes, I 3 times tried, and understand- today live I will don't watching...

I agree with you 100%

I have 2 questions:

First Problem I see with training is that there should be a difference in training regarding the intensity you play. A player playing at very low should train better than a player playing normal or even higher.
If there is a difference then it is not noticeable. That makes no sense to me.
On the other hand i see no difference in play due to energy. Right now i see only disadvantage to teams playing very low against teams playing normal. The points you lose during the first half of season you wont get back due to better energy.
So why risking losing games with very low energy if there is no advantage?

And the second question is regarding the performance depending the intensity you play. I got the impression that my goalkeeper or my forwards are doing worse when i`m playing very low. Is there something like in hockey where the performance of the goalie is related to the intensity?

Vlady, mayby you could bring also some official light into the dark?

should there really be a difference? Should the players who work harder have less training efficiency? Does that seem logical to you?

"i see no difference in play due to energy" - what do you mean by this because you deny this statement in the follow-up text.

If you think playing very low is an unnecessary risk, then don't. It's as simple as that.

Your forwards should be playing worse when you play on very low. That's the whole idea. They will attempt long range shots instead of getting closer to the goal and therefore they will have a lower percentage of hitting the target. Goalkeepers on the other hand are not yet influenced by game importance. Not yet anyway.