Subject: Senior Canadian Basketball National Team

His sht q is 59, and it needs to go up 60pts. Would take 2 seasons for a new owner to fix properly and by then he would never be worth 100mil

Dont worth 100mil+ we agree. Where we disagree is in the number of points he needs. I think you stick to much the the ratio here. 2 of our best SG, Mason and Long at 25y only have 80 and 90 in shot. So if this year, and I think it is feasible, Loewen gets to 80, with a Pas and Tec at 140 he will be very useful as a third or fourth player. BUT, this is in a scenario where he is taken by a first division team with good infra and wants to train him in shot. There are many ifs here, I agree.

And look at his game RAT : 59 in last game: basketball.powerplaymanag...

Think game ratings are over-rated and not completely accurate

Does not take into account Sht and Blk, which lead to the great debate. In his last game, Loewen gets lot of A and the most point in a victory of his team. Since I have started this game I tried to figure out how much SH and BL a player should Have. Look at Lisbie, great career, but I dont want to use him as he has 38 and 39 in Bl and SH which to not seems to bother Sith Lords and the guy has good stats...

I feel like for PG rating was really important since they didn't took a lot of shot and blocking was not that much important for a guard.

But rumors said PG are taking more shot now so I could change.

Off-topic: Comment tu fais pour jouer en français haha j'ai abandonnée jour 1.

Dans Paramètres, tu mets ta langue en Francais. Je fais le switch de temps en temps car c'est utile de connaitre les termes anglais pour le forum!

Suis ce lien : ppm.powerplaymanager.com/...

Nah ce que je voulais dire c'est que je déteste tellement la version française que j'ai changer en anglais jour 1.

Juste les positions j'étais complètement mêlé.

AH! Comprendo! Je fais les 2 en fait, mais oui c'est melant je te l'accorde

Surtout traduit en francais de France... je crois que je me suis donné un défi

Je crois que blocking est plus important...Mon PG blocking 94, SG 80...Je suis le seul Gerant je crois qui pensez comme ca

I think blocking effects defense in 3 ways; Blocks, steals, and shot percentage. Shooting is a good stat for anyone. Foul line shots are easy baskets. Chess man had his PG score 40 points on me one game with the Set-up tactic. I think if a manager neglects blocking in a player, that player is vulnerable in the Set-up setting. I think that the base stats are the 5 attributes
Putting a tonne of points into shooting for Centers and Power Forwards is a waste. For most teams, these two positions are going to be the best defensive players. That said, not putting points in shooting for Centers and PFs means that their foul Shooting stinks. I don't know enough about the game to be an expert. I speculate that a defensive SG to match up against another managers top SG scorer is going to pay off. My 2 cents on blocking and shooting.

Comme je disais, avant les PG ne faisait pas beaucoup de tir, il était donc pas nécessaire de monter le block vu que son matchup(surtout en man to man), ne tirait pas beaucoup. Encore lors dans la vrai vie les blocks sont très rare par les guards. Si le jeu est fidèle, monter l'attribut block serait meilleur pour intercepter les passes chez un PG.

"That said, not putting points in shooting for Centers and PFs means that their foul Shooting stinks"

Ask Deandre Jordan or Shaq.