Subject: Which center would you choose?

What about switching them (for friendlies) so that you can examine the effect of linemates?

Also, were those ORs or just the ORs of the 2:1:1/4:3:2 packages? It's interesting stuff. I like the idea that 4:3:2 would be a better build -- even moreso if there really isn't a secondary/tertiary split, and instead there is something to 'tec' wingers and 'agr' wingers.

OR is their OR not their effective OR. I may switch it up a bit for friendlies. But I'll wait and see the long-term results since you can't really make conclusions after say 8 games.

My best lines so far are the ones where all players are good passers.

How much do you train pass on your wingers?

at least 40

I suppose it varies with me. I have some wingers that are 4:3:2:3:2 (O:S:T:A) and others that have it completely ignored. Perhaps once I get to 4:3:2 with 100 prime I'll toss some pass in there and see where she takes me.

I will be wondering this also. Since I am lower I only aim for a 60:30:30:30 primary/shot/secondaries. And for the other off stats like pass for wingers or aggression for centers, I have been thinking and following through on leveling it up to at least 25. Thinking it would be beneficial. If it's all for not though then I would rather just skip it so I could focus on moving my guys up to 75 and then 80 primary builds.

I've actually made some "flat" guys. Where they are 2:1:1~ and pass=shot=agr=tech for Cs and Ws. It's an experiment in progress though.

I'd bet they'll be very effective players.

Some people don't like it. Some people do. When I sold them they fetched the most of any player. I had some that were 2:2:1:1:1:1 (D:O:S:T:A) who sold for the most since they can be D, W or C.