Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
Players released from active teams hit the market. Players on inactive teams "go down with the ship". Problem with inactives is they're not "kicked".
Yeah, I know, that is what I want to be changed, therefor they should use my table when teams get inactive.
And people that are kicked should not hit the market if they are not good enough.
And people that are kicked should not hit the market if they are not good enough.
what does it matter to you if they do appear on the market? if you don't want them, then don't buy them, I would say ....
also, they may not be interesting to you, but other teams may have different criteria for who qualifies as a good player...
also, they may not be interesting to you, but other teams may have different criteria for who qualifies as a good player...
Ah, was just a suggestion, so not to many players would hit the market if many players from inactive teams are put in there.
One way to make Crico's suggestion work, tell me a better way to make it work and I can see what I think of it
I think there will be players enough for teams with lower criteria even if many kicked players doesn't hit the market.
One way to make Crico's suggestion work, tell me a better way to make it work and I can see what I think of it

I think there will be players enough for teams with lower criteria even if many kicked players doesn't hit the market.
My personal opinion is that the system, regarding auto-market-putting players, is quite good as it is.
RE: Substitutions cosmetic changes... could we
1. Get the ability to rename a substitution instead of Substitution 1, Substitution 2 etc.
2. Get the ability to change the order substitutions display on the page
When you have more than half a dozen it gets hard to manage.
1. Get the ability to rename a substitution instead of Substitution 1, Substitution 2 etc.
2. Get the ability to change the order substitutions display on the page
When you have more than half a dozen it gets hard to manage.
Page 'offers'
?) (polish language version: soccer.powerplaymanager.c... 'players' - additional column needed, to see the status of the offer for RFA without clicking every player
(status: waiting for offers, offer accepted - waiting for own club to respond / contract extended...)

(status: waiting for offers, offer accepted - waiting for own club to respond / contract extended...)
Why do not you do something with your finances, strong clubs get a lot more money than the average and weaker clubs and therefore less people running clubs are losing the will to play, not because I can not catch up with them, or a little closer to the strong clubs no matter how long they play. In my opinion he should reduce such differences in sponsors.
What nedozvolite to make tournaments in which to invest money for participating in the game and where the awards were cash that would certainly help the clubs who win awards.
But she has to come up with a model where the weaker clubs get little chance to reach the leading teams, with this economy, it's impossible.
That´s a long therm game. Teams that are strong got there (rich and with nice players) because of their managers effort, and not the other way around. Many redistributive measures were taken in the last seasons but the source of the remaining difference amongst teams are not due to sponsor offers but mainly to managers efforts in in-game tactics, market operations and their strategy for infrastructure investments.
You're wrong, I agree that there should be differences in sponsorship contracts, but that the difference is 50 million a week that's a lot. Write me a message on the PPM as the TV rights to you and how much you sponsorship deal so I'll write here what is mine.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts