Time:
Log out
Subject: Suggestions| Select a country: |
|
International |
Of course, if history proves true, don't expect PPM to listen to us or do this.
oh really? I'm listening and considering, but it's not only my call.
I am sure - history has prove that this model isn't satisfying.
Understood. I do apologise, my comment wasn't meant to sound quite as negative as it was. Would definitely be good if PPM did put some thought into this, and also into the suggestion in the other tread re: seasonal energy loss being gained back.
So we can currently send players to training camps, maybe allow us to send them on holidays... No training improvement, but energy up!
I'd like to suggest that on the page we see our players, we could sort the pleyers' list considering their energy amount, just like we actually do with the columns age, number, name, etc.
Actually the column energy is not sortable.
Actually the column energy is not sortable.
If so what is sorted? End-of-game or seasonal energy? Least amount missing?
Actual energy would be the best choice in my opinion.
Maybe seasonal would be better.
you cannot sort it, because it is displayed in the form of a fraction. therefore 88/88 equals 100/100.
Why not PPM on phone , Get every thing new in our phones ? play it as well why not , did you thought about that ?
Do you mean an apple or android application?
Yes , or get SMS's to your phone from a server created by the PPM team
Another Suggestion I had in mind.
Teaching players to use their weaker foot in order to become a Universal player with both feet.
I think this would be hugely valuable to the managers here.
How it could be implemented wouldn't be too hard I think.
Simply have a set amount of games a player must play on their weaker side.
50 games?
100 games?
The catch is that the manager must be prepared to pay the penalty of having a player on the wrong side in their team for the set amount of games.
Teaching players to use their weaker foot in order to become a Universal player with both feet.
I think this would be hugely valuable to the managers here.
How it could be implemented wouldn't be too hard I think.
Simply have a set amount of games a player must play on their weaker side.
50 games?
100 games?
The catch is that the manager must be prepared to pay the penalty of having a player on the wrong side in their team for the set amount of games.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 89ms / php: 70ms / db: 20ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 89ms / php: 70ms / db: 20ms ]
Web server: WB1