Heres what ive been sent. I just dont understand.
"this is football and Australia is a hot candidate for the league to have its own and its own representation. And I would like you to stand for election. You would have been an assistant coach and me. I found this game from the best players here is what I have no experience with it. If you agree please write to me what criteria I find. Age: less than 21 Total skills: more than 450th Marek
------
> Firstly the australian league in Hockey or Soccer?
>
> Secondly why are you wanting to do this?
>
> ------
> > Hi, I plan to make the Australian league. We are dealing with the founder of this project (PPM). At the same time if the league created and developed by the Australian national team. I need to make a majority managers in Australia. Write-off of me, whether of the same opinion, or whether disagree. All the best. Marek"
Select a country: |
![]() |
Oceania |
More mails. Apparently wants to be assistant coach to one of us as the NT coach.
While i would love to have an Aussie NT i dont think that making an Aussie League is a good idea at all. Poor Eric left basically by himself with a couple of other teams.
While i would love to have an Aussie NT i dont think that making an Aussie League is a good idea at all. Poor Eric left basically by himself with a couple of other teams.
Ide like an Aussie league if we had the numbers that is which looks like we dont have. Is it a Oceania league at the moment?? Also the dude writing to us doesnt make sense hahahaha.
I agree. An Aussie league would effectively destroy the core community we have built here.
PPM's inability to have a NT without a league is simply bad programming. They could make it happen if they wanted, they simply choose not to.
PPM's inability to have a NT without a league is simply bad programming. They could make it happen if they wanted, they simply choose not to.
i think the oceania league we have at the moment is fine, and we could do with an oceania National Team
I dont want to be left all alone!

I dont want to be left all alone!
Yeah we should have an oceania national team that would be cool. And that would allow us to have some decent numbers to play with

the otago united champions league dream continues... with a higly creditable 0-0 draw away to American team Boilermakers. Could have been an away win if my striker had scored a pen too!
Awesome! Your lads are doing you proud this season!
I got a reverse strategy since mid season very high against the beatable teams and very low against the teams I have no chance. Has worked a treat so far, but coming into some of those games where I have no chance so will just run a seconds team and take the losses.
Not a bad strategy, but the latter half of the season would see your team with some major energy loss.
Yeah thats for sure however because my team is pretty much all new and has full energy when I bought the new players (about middle of the season) I can manage it. It has saved me from relegation I was close to bottom four and it has now ensured I will be able to stay in league one
Next season I wont be able to do this from the start of the season but next season my team should be solid enough to stay in division one permanently without having to have extreme tactics like this.
Also how does energy work exactly? If my dude is say 80 energy and I will he perform worse then someone with 100 energy? So I guess the question is is there a level when a players starts performing bad say when they hit like 60 energy or something or is it a gradual thing ie. performance reduces per level of energy lost?

Also how does energy work exactly? If my dude is say 80 energy and I will he perform worse then someone with 100 energy? So I guess the question is is there a level when a players starts performing bad say when they hit like 60 energy or something or is it a gradual thing ie. performance reduces per level of energy lost?
General consensus on seasonal energy is that you lose 1% attribute strength for every energy number you lose.
So, a player with 80% energy would only perform 80% as good as he would with 100% energy. Or, in attribute terms, if you had a forward with Off 100, pass 50, tech 50 etc he would only really be as good as off 80, pass 40, tech 40 (ie. 80% of each attribute).
That's a very rough way of putting it, but hopefully it makes sense. Needless to say, anything below 80% is pretty bad. I try and keep my guys above 90% for most the season.
So, a player with 80% energy would only perform 80% as good as he would with 100% energy. Or, in attribute terms, if you had a forward with Off 100, pass 50, tech 50 etc he would only really be as good as off 80, pass 40, tech 40 (ie. 80% of each attribute).
That's a very rough way of putting it, but hopefully it makes sense. Needless to say, anything below 80% is pretty bad. I try and keep my guys above 90% for most the season.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts