Time:
Log out
Subject: Senior Canada National Team
The players that got cut had no or almost no chemistry.
| Select a country: |
|
Canada |
We know that, thanks for the reminder The players that got cut had no or almost no chemistry.
The players that got cut had no or almost no chemistry.
ok because I found 2 goalies whit the potential to be in the team.
I haven't forgot about them, don't worry. We won't be selecting Labonte though, has he's very similar to Rowan Craig, minus the chemistry.
He his still pretty good but I understand. Still Grebe would be pretty good for the future
To all managers: please upload your players! Only 5 or 6 teams have done so right now. The way things are going, I'll have to put the exact same lineup than last season on the ice.
--
À tous les managers: merci d'uploader vos joueurs! Il n'y a que 5 ou 6 équipes qui l'ont fait jusqu'à maintenant. De la façon dont les choses se déroulent, je vais devoir aligner la même formation que la saison dernière.
--
À tous les managers: merci d'uploader vos joueurs! Il n'y a que 5 ou 6 équipes qui l'ont fait jusqu'à maintenant. De la façon dont les choses se déroulent, je vais devoir aligner la même formation que la saison dernière.
i have noone worth submitting...
again ):
again ):
My 2cents:
1- Beliveau is not CDN #1center anymore.
2- Why is Cadette or Codette still on this team?
1- Beliveau is not CDN #1center anymore.
2- Why is Cadette or Codette still on this team?
Your 2 cents are more than welcomed
1- I believe he is! Or close to, maybe #2, we'll see. It's not just about OR, exp matters as well and he has a ton of it.
2-Because he brings a lot of skill to our lineup. He's one of the most talented players we've got, even though he's not a sniper, of course.
1- I believe he is! Or close to, maybe #2, we'll see. It's not just about OR, exp matters as well and he has a ton of it.
2-Because he brings a lot of skill to our lineup. He's one of the most talented players we've got, even though he's not a sniper, of course.
I have anoher question: Why are we still at 34 players?
so that we can add more players in the future. once the player is on the team, we cannot get them off the team until next season
I know but I dont think you need a margin as big as this
The additional players would get no or almost no ice time anyway. We were hoping to get a few new players on the roster, but based on the submissions we received (almost none), it would be basically the same 50 guys than last year (and the guys we've cut had 0 chemistry, not like they had played many games last season).
1- is 200exp really better then 150exp? even though the 150 guy has better ratings?
2- good luck with Cadette. I had a similar player in Mike Wood but it never really worked without good PA or good SH
2- good luck with Cadette. I had a similar player in Mike Wood but it never really worked without good PA or good SH
I understand but you could still maybe let them play some games so they can get a better chemestry for next year. Anymay I know you guys can get the job done.
I did a (rough) count of 1500 OR Canadian players that still have a CL of 4/6 and found 18 such players. I was surprised to find only 10 of these 18 on the NT.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 104ms / php: 64ms / db: 40ms ]
Web server: WB2
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 104ms / php: 64ms / db: 40ms ]
Web server: WB2