Subject: Reporting bugs

Both? LOL i think until the PPM team take a look we wont know. It sure has my interest peaked though, as the energy loss should not be that high after just 2 games.

It could be, if they have played 2nd and/or 3rd period of day 1 match with importance higher than normal. But we can't know that.

in your first game you played high in second period and very high in third period. The report from first game didnt show these changes, but I can tell that from your tactical settings and the score of that game. That's why your players lost so much energy

What do you write?
I read news and there was written- in normal game players will lost 0.5 energy. If you look to my matches then you can see it- in 2 games 6 periods=5 normal+1 low. I don't understand anything- before when players have played in normal game they lost 0.4 energy but just moment everything turned to hell. Just moment my players lost 3 energy for 2 game in league then they will play at the end with 50-60 energy? This system worked only in my team or.....

didnt get your point?

From where you can see that? if my players played in first game high and very high then why that didn't showed in the match report? And if they played then how they can lost so more energy. I know when players played in high they will lost 1 and in very high lost 1.5 energy. And just moment I calculated it- 0.5+1+1.5+0.5+0.25=3.75. If my players lost 1 and 1.5 energy for one period then I haven't any words for your new bad systems. This say only one- Say GOOD BYE to the hockey team in the 2-nd league.
Please explain me your new bad-stupid system.

What do you want to say with it?

The match reports from the first game are incorrect I believe, so we can't rely on them.

The .5 energy loss is based on playing 25% of the game, with all 4 lines playing even time. You played 3 lines so they are going to play more time on ice, and therefore use more energy.

And your top line played 45% of the game, which is about 25 minutes of the game so their energy loss is going to twice that of a normal player on a 4 line system.

But as Vlady said, it sounds like you used high or very high as your tactic.

Can you see high or very high style in my 1-st match? they played normal game form start to the end. Show me where that. If they they played high or very high then explain me which line played at that time- all my lines played with high or very high style? This new system very bad start for my team....

As i said, there is an ERROR in the reporting apparently.

You appear to be the only person struggling with the new system

4 games and pp/pk 3%?

the report from game 1 is wrong as I have told you. Your energy is calculated correctly

PK situation for my team, with 2nd line RD out.
42:03 - Maks Iskra takes a weak shot from the blueline. Pavle Lazič gets hold of the loose puck in front of the net and sends Dejan Iskra into a breakaway, he is coming at Niko Kopič all alone from the red line, takes a low shot and doesn't score. He picked the wrong time to execute poorly.

Pavle Lazič is my 1st PK line RD and Dejan Iskra is my 2nd PK line RD. What are they doing on ice at the same time?

Was a guy from one of your PK lines in the box?