Subject: Reporting bugs

same as my opponent today...

thanks. It is part of the problem with the game importance not being recorded properly in the database. However, it was used correctly in the actual game calculation

Team Analysis page says that they have played Very low importance in 2nd and 3rd period for every single team I have checked.

apparantly this is part of this problem too.

There is something wrong with the PP and PK type "Experience" (%). Yesterday it was 5%, now it is just 1%. My guess is that friendlies add 1% and league games 5%, and that there is an error that does not add the numbers together, it just shows the last increase.

the 5% gain was wrong. it was adjusted today to fit what we intended

So it is at 1% after 1 friendly and 1 league game, it will take time to master :p

I just noticed it too.

When I go to League results page, it shows results from game day 1, it should show results from this day. Results from game day 2 are there if I select that day.

Hello everybody.... I think there are something goes wrong. In league My team has played 2 game and just moment from 1-st line 3 energy lost. I played normal game with 1-st line 45%, with 2-nd 40% and the end with 3-rd line 15%. You can see it from this games.
hockey.powerplaymanager.com/ru /game-summary.html?data=849586 6
hockey.powerplaymanager.com/ru /game-summary.html?data=849585 6
Please explain me are there something wrong or you change game. But I read news about hockey and there are written this- In normal game line of team will lost 0.5 energy. My thanks for your attention.

Yes, .50 energy based on 15 minutes or 25% of the game.

You played 45% with 3 lines, so your guys used more than double that energy loss.

i don't get it.. if his 1 line played 45% 2 times on normal, i expect formula should work like 0.45*0.5/0.25*2=1.8 (energy loss)? where those 3% came from?

I agree, something doesn't seem right in the math.

But, over those 2 games he also had 12 powerplays, which would have skewed the time on ice. I don't know if the game engine takes all that into factor, but if it did, the actual time on ice of that top line could have been a LOT higher than the 45% set in the tactics.

And they even haven't played all 6 periods on Normal. Team analysis page says they've player 3 x Normal, 1 x Low and 2 x Very low. But then again, match summaries for day 1 are wrong and team analysis pages are still counting 2 very low periods for day 1 mathes for all teams.
So we can't know, what importance was really played in 2nd and 3rd period of day 1 match by this team.

so is it a bug or pp and pk have some influence on ice time?