Select a country: |
![]() |
Latvia |
I currently have a team ready to play the next match. Now I'm trying to scout, or waiting for players to be scouted by the managers so I can see who can add or not to the current squad. I also want to call up some players who can play now and compete for positions with the current starters. And some under-17s. Currently the only position with excess is goalkeepers.
I can only call up one more GK at most. That's why I'm leaving it to do so later... no rush, just one more 17-year-old GK. I have plenty of 18-year-old goalkeepers. The biggest need is for Line players. But I'm not in a rush anymore, because I've already called up some players and we have a team for the next game. Now I want to try not to call up the wrong ones in the next ones.
A good format for submitting players is to detail what each attribute represents, and then explain its quality in parentheses right next to it. Example: A Wing: Attack 240 (99) Shoot 200 (99), Technique 120 (99) Aggressiveness 120 (99). Passing and defense should also be included as they can be tiebreaker criteria, even if they are less important for a LW/RW.
Age and TC are not necessary because I can already see this without needing to observe.
I have to know exactly all the relevant skills, not just the primary ones, and well explained so I can identify the player's position, as well as all the qualities to be able to make the best decision. Ty All.
Age and TC are not necessary because I can already see this without needing to observe.
I have to know exactly all the relevant skills, not just the primary ones, and well explained so I can identify the player's position, as well as all the qualities to be able to make the best decision. Ty All.

Update on the U18 call-up. We already have 28 players selected. Enough to play the next match. And we already have all 4 lines ready to play. But I haven't decided if I'll use all four lines. But don't worry, we still have 22 spots. We can call up 22 more players. And we will go little by little.
To have any chance of being a starter we would need something like this in the moment:
Wing: 330ATk 230Shot 165Tec 165Agr
Center: 340ATK 250Shot 170Tec 170Agr
LD or RD: 370Def 185Pass 105Tec 185Agr
GK: 490GK 245/245
These are just approximate numbers, so you can get an idea, I accept other types of training. I'm open-minded. And I also want 17-year-olds with higher overall skills and potential, But there will be fewer places available for 17s at the moment.
If anyone thinks they have a useful or indispensable player, let me know.
To have any chance of being a starter we would need something like this in the moment:
Wing: 330ATk 230Shot 165Tec 165Agr
Center: 340ATK 250Shot 170Tec 170Agr
LD or RD: 370Def 185Pass 105Tec 185Agr
GK: 490GK 245/245
These are just approximate numbers, so you can get an idea, I accept other types of training. I'm open-minded. And I also want 17-year-olds with higher overall skills and potential, But there will be fewer places available for 17s at the moment.
If anyone thinks they have a useful or indispensable player, let me know.
Hello friends, we achieved our first victory in our U18. 5-0 About the United Kingdom. It's true that they weren't one of the strongest opponents. But it was important to win anyway. Any suggestions during our journey will be welcome.
You should write about national team in U18 national team forum. This is for players in general, not about U18.
Of course, and I apologize, my Latvian is a bit bad, so maybe I didn't find the forum appropriate. Could you send me the link?
Your favorite threads
Newest posts