Subject: [Old] Canada Senior NT Discussion

I think 60's, with high secondaries.

okay goalies should be the easiest to judge
the question should be midfield and def

probably 60s with ratio
4:3:3 for MC and 4:3:2:2 for side M
4:3:2:2 for side D and 4:2:2:2 for DC

I know this is pure speculation, but the fact there are primary, secondary and tertiary alternate atties makes me doubt the ideal ratio is 4:x:y:2.

For sure it's not 4:3:3:2 since otherwise there would be no tertiary.

I doubt the ratio is something like 10:8:7:5 or so, we human tend to love rounded things ; I assume so do the devs.

That's why I personnaly train my guys 6:4:3:2. This sounds good to me since secondary is then 1/2, while primary and tertiary are 2/3 and 1/3.

I tend to prefer this over 8:6:4:2, which might also sound pretty interesting, although the tertiary at only 25% of main atty sounds low to me.

Last thought: I assume again that devs are human and tend to KISS keep it stupid and simple, yet IMHO, the ratio between main atty vs. primary, secondary and tertiary is probably the same for every position. Considering the way it is displayed in the guide (as a table), I take it as a positive indicator favoring my assumption.

Again: this is absolutely based on nothing else than beauty of the numbers and KISS.

i like your 6:4:3:2 and the logic behind it.

You scared me, I thought the numbers were attributes values, I was like, yes, this guy is at what 500 OR? lol

I got a couple worth a look: Brendon Boulton and Cade Bryan .

Now that I'm sure I have the right players mentioned (thanks Alex): Boulton had eight TODs on defense (5x LD, 3x CD) 75 AQ, and well balanced. Bryan is a converted defender (2x TOD RD, 3x CF) 69 AQ, balanced and the bonus of 46 defense (seems to make lots of defensive plays tackles and rarely gets carded).

Hi guys,

I have this Canadian player:

img843.imageshack.us/img8...

What do you say? Is he good to make his way into Canadian NT?

Looks amazing! He just needs much more secondary training for my money. Get the greens to 50% primary and the reds much closer to primary for my kinda money...

I just train my players with 6-3-2.5-2 system and I won Serbian I.1 league (twice in a row) and Serbian Cup. Also I played u 1/8 finals in Champions League but I couldn't do much more there coz energy of my players was very low and I didn't gamble to play it on High importance

I did some research and here's what I found based on player submissions:

So I quickly looked at bundles and the best primary to OTS ratio and found that the best primary to OTS goal was given by a ratio of:

1:0.75:?:0.35 (Primary:Major:Medium:Small)

which was slightly better than:
1:0.65:?:0.5

Just to update you. The worst ratio I found given to me was:
1:0.4:?:0.25

He is a good player... just could have been trained more effectively (less primary more OTS)

where do we submit players canuck?

PM works for me. Wherever I get it. You can email it to me as well. You mean for my goalie analysis right?