Select a country: |
![]() |
Canada |
Yes, Nathan Jobson is being trained as a LF to compliment Vincent Sharrard and Michal Himper at CF with newly acquired Leonard Macon at RF.
I know it's kinda off topic, but man, those people wanting to run our team are funny. One even posted an ad. IS it something that happens a lot elsewhere?
Happens in hockey all the time. They know they don't have a shot in their host country, the figure they do here. No idea why. We have our own community as much as they have theirs.
Slavko...
Uploaded my eligible players. Keep Zachariah Pemberton in mind as a 2nd/3rd GK. Couldn't upload due to age but his IGR is as strong or stronger than the other two... only one level behind Yves Todd and better than Hines.
Uploaded my eligible players. Keep Zachariah Pemberton in mind as a 2nd/3rd GK. Couldn't upload due to age but his IGR is as strong or stronger than the other two... only one level behind Yves Todd and better than Hines.
I have a young 16 year old SF who already has a 12 IGR, Stan Burnett , he's number 5 in the country in AvQ at 87, he's going to be starting for me next season so his experience will start to finally go up now.
I want to avoid being very sarcastic here as much as I can...
But use Math.
If we had a starting guy at 80 and backup at 20
The average would be 50 between the two.
If we had the starting guy at 100 and the backup at 0, the average will be 50.
The only difference is the starter will play more games than the backup, and therefore the starters chemistry is more important than the backups.
There is a FINITE amount of chemistry given out each season. There are (11 spots X 17 games x some amount of energy per game)
It looks like its just enough to get 11 to 100, not quite but close... so that means there is about 1100 chemistry to give out in an international season.... where would would that be the most useful?
I am going to say the starters, the people who see the most play time.
When I made that previous comment about pulling in some other players, it was only 2 games ago.
But use Math.
If we had a starting guy at 80 and backup at 20
The average would be 50 between the two.
If we had the starting guy at 100 and the backup at 0, the average will be 50.
The only difference is the starter will play more games than the backup, and therefore the starters chemistry is more important than the backups.
There is a FINITE amount of chemistry given out each season. There are (11 spots X 17 games x some amount of energy per game)
It looks like its just enough to get 11 to 100, not quite but close... so that means there is about 1100 chemistry to give out in an international season.... where would would that be the most useful?
I am going to say the starters, the people who see the most play time.
When I made that previous comment about pulling in some other players, it was only 2 games ago.
This player is going to be a nice winger Zechariah Plummer . He could be trained as LF as well. Let me know and I can update the database with him.
OK, OK. I get it. You don't understand what I'm trying to say. That is clear from your swiss cheese 'use math' rebuttle. You'll have no more input from me about what you are doing on this forum. Your time remaining at the helm is too short for me to care.
I got him in my book for scouting, but you can update him in our database. Thank you
nt-soccer.czechppm.cz/can...
nt-soccer.czechppm.cz/can...
Isaac is a nice player with good quality and if don't drop in CL can be considered for the NT as SF.
Submission of players?
There is no deadline, just want a database to be ready and updated so when next manager is up he can see and chose the players.
There is no deadline, just want a database to be ready and updated so when next manager is up he can see and chose the players.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts