From the guide:
"Technique also helps you to win faceoffs."
Is it a joke about the tech or what?
for e.g. (and milion other matches)
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
Изабери државу: |
![]() |
Међународно |
remember that it is probably a probabilty thing. Even if you have 70% chance of winning each faceoff, you may have games where you only win 30%.
If you play the same team over and over and still see results like this one then i would start questioning.
If you play the same team over and over and still see results like this one then i would start questioning.
Yes, but it takes place in almost every match, these matches for e.g.:
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
How on earth noname teams can win so many faceoffs playing against such strong teams?
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
How on earth noname teams can win so many faceoffs playing against such strong teams?
I think so. But then, what is the point of the sentence about tech? And maybe it doesn't work properly?
I have questions about players attributes.
Defence: This attribute is used by all the players to stop the opponents from scoring by not letting them create scoring chances. It is used mainly by defensemen but it is also useful for forwards who need it in order to contribute to the defensive play of the team.
Does forward need defence? I don't believe this point.
It's similar point for defenders.
Defence: This attribute is used by all the players to stop the opponents from scoring by not letting them create scoring chances. It is used mainly by defensemen but it is also useful for forwards who need it in order to contribute to the defensive play of the team.
Does forward need defence? I don't believe this point.
It's similar point for defenders.
Nowhere does it say forwards "need" defense. It only says it helps.
But you don't believe what is in the guide. I don't either. The guide is all lies written down to mislead us and keep us from succeeding.
But you don't believe what is in the guide. I don't either. The guide is all lies written down to mislead us and keep us from succeeding.
Just statistical probabilities. Computers are not capable of random

Precisely
This whole "random" thing just annoys me.

This whole "random" thing just annoys me.
You're losing me regarding the random thing. If a program is set to choose between say 1000 things all with the same probability, can't that be expressed as purely random?
I understand in the context of the game it isn't a matter of equal probabilities to make it purely random. So in the case of something like my team actually beating Popajis' team some would say he was a victim of random. How would you prefer it be said, he was a victim of the improbable?
I understand in the context of the game it isn't a matter of equal probabilities to make it purely random. So in the case of something like my team actually beating Popajis' team some would say he was a victim of random. How would you prefer it be said, he was a victim of the improbable?
If the game was random than all of us with a few statistical variations would essentially have .500 records.
To paraphrase a great coach, "If we play ten times you might win 9, but today I am going to win"
Bad luck, improbable, the cards didn't fall, unlucky roll of the dice.... anything but random
To paraphrase a great coach, "If we play ten times you might win 9, but today I am going to win"
Bad luck, improbable, the cards didn't fall, unlucky roll of the dice.... anything but random

Gotcha, I think. So what I was surmising about the game with Popaji was the correct way to state it as improbably rather than random?
As for dice tho, since it's same odds of rolling any combo as another isn't it correct to refer to that as random?
As for dice tho, since it's same odds of rolling any combo as another isn't it correct to refer to that as random?
Твоје омиљене теме
Нове поруке на форуму