well i just typed some number without much thoughts just to exemplify it may not be actually a bug but a change of mind to include more range options
my numbers were percentage of perfection for position. would work just like using stars as canucks did.
but canucks sample does not show a A player becoming a B player
A before was 4 starts or more. in his example he would still be A in the new version...
so chancing his version, without much thoughts neither ...
A+- 5*
A - 4.5*
B - 3.5, 4.0*
C - 2.5, 3.0*
D - <2.5*
now we have a former 4.0 A that became a B
Selecione um país: | EUA |
That assumes your scouting is perfect. I think the scouting accuracy was updated. Not sure though. Your theory of rejigging the classification could be quite true. Perhaps with my perfect scouting I will pick A B C D players and make note of their stars... PPM Mag article pending
lol since i dont care about hockey you should guess i am doing the same
except i wont have an A available for me for sure.
except i wont have an A available for me for sure.
the staff does not matter as i used your own team with perfect scouting as example. u mentioned to me before u had a A that became B ...
I posted in HF just FYI. Calling a truce and going the Canadian peacekeeping route haha. Well, what we used to do before our current d-bag leader came in and only cared about oil...
truce? never. i wont truce when the enemy is falling! take this!! POW! that! PW. now this is looking too cartoonish. maybe i should go to japanese forum and get some fight script ..
Enemy? Our teams have never even played one and other!
that is what i thought .. you still play Wii
Seus tópicos favoritos
Mensagens mais recentes