You don't know numbers.
Which is bigger? 137+ 15% or 149 ?
Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
i will be glad that he obtain the qualify and you not,and i wish you more games like that,what do you say?
My last post on this subject.
Pay attention.
His midfielders sum rating is 113. Midfield indicator 160. Coefficient for midfield 160/113 = 1.41.
His midfielder with 25 rating was sent off. Midfielders sum rating dropped to 88. When you play with 3 midfielder, coefficient is higher, but I will calculate using 1.41. 1.41 * 88 means 124 (this would be midfield stregth indicator).
124 + 121 + 160 + 81 means a team strength of 121.5. Considering his home advantage, he would go to 140.
Now, 140 vs 149 and you have 99.99% chances of win ? I don't think so mate !
Pay attention.
His midfielders sum rating is 113. Midfield indicator 160. Coefficient for midfield 160/113 = 1.41.
His midfielder with 25 rating was sent off. Midfielders sum rating dropped to 88. When you play with 3 midfielder, coefficient is higher, but I will calculate using 1.41. 1.41 * 88 means 124 (this would be midfield stregth indicator).
124 + 121 + 160 + 81 means a team strength of 121.5. Considering his home advantage, he would go to 140.
Now, 140 vs 149 and you have 99.99% chances of win ? I don't think so mate !
Sorry, forgot about game importance. But anyways, not 99.99%. As I said, 35% - 65% (best case).
ok my last post too!
you are calculating through deduction but the engine of this game is more complex than your calculations.and the tactics are not many to choose,but dont tell me the story with own stadium because my team is one of the best outside...
you are calculating through deduction but the engine of this game is more complex than your calculations.and the tactics are not many to choose,but dont tell me the story with own stadium because my team is one of the best outside...
Probably because in 2nd half your opponent substitued two of his defenders for defenders with much lower rating, maybe he also changed formation in 2nd half.
It is possible that I already had a player in the position Criblez should be subed to BUT if you check the screenshot, you can see that in the same minute, just one line above the Pletikosa <=> Criblez sub, I moved Masina from RCM (Criblez position) to CM. So the spot should have been free..
But that would mean if I change player's position ad want to change his position later again or substitute him with another player - the change won't happen?
In other words, only the first player position change works - the others don't?
In other words, only the first player position change works - the others don't?
So that should be it. From my experience you can not change a players position to a spot already covered by another player, even if you move him away in the same sub. He must have moved away in an earlier setting. (That's I think also why a sub after a sent-off has to be done to a different spot.)
Probably, yes.
It's a shame we didn't get any official response for this matter.
This kind of bugs me now, cause I have a feeling some of the changes I make are not being made. Hopefully the position changes will be implemented in the match report very soon.
It's a shame we didn't get any official response for this matter.
This kind of bugs me now, cause I have a feeling some of the changes I make are not being made. Hopefully the position changes will be implemented in the match report very soon.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts