
Select a country: |
![]() |
International |
I knew it. And for the record.. it's not nice to tease us with "edit-option"! PPM team might "suffer" outbreak of revolution

Not trying to be a smartass here but is it alright to tell your rival's player's stats here...?
Your player compared to his ->
off +2, sho +8, tec +10, pas -19, hea -17
This itself should tell us something here. Most important ones are +20 for you but lesser ones are +36 for him. Even with better exp he has +4 RAT more so i'd say you need to train more less important ones.
off +2, sho +8, tec +10, pas -19, hea -17
This itself should tell us something here. Most important ones are +20 for you but lesser ones are +36 for him. Even with better exp he has +4 RAT more so i'd say you need to train more less important ones.
lol....he doesnt care as long as i didnt hijack his account and do something bad to his team XD
How must worse does a player perform if you play him as right-back rather then left-back if he is left-footed?
Im just guessing...5-10%...
I never had it compared game after game, but if I recall right some conversations with some more experience managers it was in that range
I never had it compared game after game, but if I recall right some conversations with some more experience managers it was in that range
Not really. If I really dont know I would not post any answer at all.
SInce I do have some good idea about it I answered him 5-10% with a note that that is not 100% sure, but im pretty sure its something around it.
SInce I do have some good idea about it I answered him 5-10% with a note that that is not 100% sure, but im pretty sure its something around it.
Ok, thank you for answearing Ivan, got another question about this then
If you consider that this is right, would it then be better to put a inferior left-back as right-back.
He should not lose the same amount of "matchrating" as a better player would.
Hope you understand my poor english

If you consider that this is right, would it then be better to put a inferior left-back as right-back.
He should not lose the same amount of "matchrating" as a better player would.
Hope you understand my poor english

Would you like to have RD on LD position that makes 19 rather than one who makes 22 ?
Of course I would prefer 22. But I rather have a LD that have 19 than noone else. Suspensions is a pity

I think it would be better to have RD that makes 22 as LD than LD that makes 19 as LD. Seems reasonable.
Suspensions are pain in the ass if you don't have a back up player.
Suspensions are pain in the ass if you don't have a back up player.
I have 2 right defenders, thats "the thing". Therefor I wonder if I should use the 22 rating right defender as a Left defender or the 19 rating.
Therefor I guess it would Influense less on the rating if I use the 19 rating. But if I use the 22 as left defenders my defenders will be more even.
Therefor I guess it would Influense less on the rating if I use the 19 rating. But if I use the 22 as left defenders my defenders will be more even.
If you don't have time to investigate what number would your RD show as a LD, try to take Ivan's advice (use the worst presumption 10%), and then make final decision.
So, as Popeye says...if your RD is making better rating on the LD than your LD than use the RD.
It does not matter what is his best position if has better rating.
Ofcourse you can test the ratings in a friendly match.
Put your LD on LD in 1st half, and set up a substitution for him at half time. remove that LD out and put in that RD you wanted to use as LD.
And than you will be sure who does better rating.
If they do same rating use the LD.
It does not matter what is his best position if has better rating.
Ofcourse you can test the ratings in a friendly match.
Put your LD on LD in 1st half, and set up a substitution for him at half time. remove that LD out and put in that RD you wanted to use as LD.
And than you will be sure who does better rating.
If they do same rating use the LD.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts