Select a country: |
![]() |
Canada |
Oops I misunderstood what you said, I thought you said that my player was going to easily sell $ 8M. I'm not very good English and was not concentrated either: D (not easy the day after the day of the year: p)
I try a new tactic, when I started my hockey team while I keep my best players and I want to see if I sell them and I put more money in infrastructure if I come away a winner. I say that having such a good player in my team have been using almost nothing because the infrastructure is not efficient and I would have trouble well developed as it should. According to the logic, a Sports Academy more advanced should get out of best player so my money will not be lost ^ ^. But it is a good test, I may make a mistake too.
(Sorry if there are few faults is that I use Google translation and I will fix a few that I know I have more difficulty writing than reading)
(Sorry if there are few faults is that I use Google translation and I will fix a few that I know I have more difficulty writing than reading)
haha, no need to apologize! as long as i can comprehend, i'm cool with that
well, while i agree with your logic, i think it would be wiser to sell high OR players and keep the high quality players.. but that's just me. i mean, 90+ or even 80+ players are hard to come by.

well, while i agree with your logic, i think it would be wiser to sell high OR players and keep the high quality players.. but that's just me. i mean, 90+ or even 80+ players are hard to come by.
Yes it is true that hard to have (high quality), but hey I decided to make this technique would have thought it too much, I wanted to sell my best players to see how I would receive for never not too much soccer and I decided to stay to play (I understand not much compared to the Hockey)
CHC go on the road and play spoiler, drawing 0-0 at OAP. OAP slide to fifth and are now cKs biggest fans as a cKs win in the CL will give OAP a spot in that tournament. CHC's second half collapse ends with them alone in 7th, and looking for answers for a better result next season.
I wish you!
I prefer he plays in Canada than elsewhere, even if it increased the competition: p
I prefer he plays in Canada than elsewhere, even if it increased the competition: p
Please, someone in Canada, bid higher. I don't want him in II.2 in a competing team

Actually, I think you play me. From the guide:
"Teams ranked 15th to 18th will play the runners-up from the lower divisions to avoid relegation. The 15th ranked team, as a rule, plays in the relegation round against the runner-up from the league with the highest number. If, for instance, this team plays in II.3, it plays against the runner-up from III.12. On the other hand, the 18th ranked team from II.3 plays against the runner-up from III.9."
"Teams ranked 15th to 18th will play the runners-up from the lower divisions to avoid relegation. The 15th ranked team, as a rule, plays in the relegation round against the runner-up from the league with the highest number. If, for instance, this team plays in II.3, it plays against the runner-up from III.12. On the other hand, the 18th ranked team from II.3 plays against the runner-up from III.9."
I confirm this is the way it worked for me last season in hockey.
Ahh true. I should probs read the guide more
damn i got a much tougher match up now than I thought. but still good luck, hope it's a good series


Good luck to you as well. I hear now is a good time to send your top players to training camp, perhaps you should look into that. :p
I got my best player Yves Todd with level 6 or 7.
I would keep a player with Q >80 and sell the high OR players (with that money you can increase facilities, nobody has a facility higher level than 9-10)
I would keep a player with Q >80 and sell the high OR players (with that money you can increase facilities, nobody has a facility higher level than 9-10)
Your favorite threads
Newest posts