Select a country: |
![]() |
USA |
That might actually be one of the parts of the game that some people don't like so much.
well. not saying to give more money than its worth. but sometimes we dont put on transfer because we're afraid to sell to low or not to sell if put too pricy and unlcky nobody bid.
and im not suggesting for terrible. im actually sugesting for the good players.
legmann make sure the player is sold at fair/good price, train and resell so so9meone cam actually devolp the players long run.
this would help USA in general: managers and team usa
and im not suggesting for terrible. im actually sugesting for the good players.
legmann make sure the player is sold at fair/good price, train and resell so so9meone cam actually devolp the players long run.
this would help USA in general: managers and team usa
that is because the rich will always be richier.
they can buy prospects at cheap, train for a seson or two and resell to make huge profit.
that is because it benefits the "merchant" a lot. But if legmann is "quiting" it would actually benefit all as teams would be more competitive (extra cash to develop) and it would be more fun.
there are ways PPM could do to prevent players being sold at too much. they could implement internal formula to calculate player worth. then when placed on marked, the team is hard capped to how much it can start asking.
since the teams are limited to a percentage of the current price to bid, it would require multiple bids to get the player to increase the value considerable higher.
that is just one out many solutions that could be applied to prevent fraud.
they can buy prospects at cheap, train for a seson or two and resell to make huge profit.
that is because it benefits the "merchant" a lot. But if legmann is "quiting" it would actually benefit all as teams would be more competitive (extra cash to develop) and it would be more fun.
there are ways PPM could do to prevent players being sold at too much. they could implement internal formula to calculate player worth. then when placed on marked, the team is hard capped to how much it can start asking.
since the teams are limited to a percentage of the current price to bid, it would require multiple bids to get the player to increase the value considerable higher.
that is just one out many solutions that could be applied to prevent fraud.
Fraud? What fraud?
@ Leggman: That wire transfer of about 4 billion didn't come yesterday. Please send again.
@ Leggman: That wire transfer of about 4 billion didn't come yesterday. Please send again.

I'm a little pissed at Leggman for blowing up his team when he did. I played him when his team was still strong and shipped 9 goals to him. Then a week later playing the Force is an automatic 3 points for any team. I think he should have folded his team at the end of the season to make it fair to everyone.
He was going to do just that, but I convinced him to screw you over one last time.
hockey.powerplaymanager.c...
Team strengths are pretty much even, I was playing at home, won tactics, outshot them 46-16, even faceoffs, penalties were 6-1, and I lose 3-2.
Team strengths are pretty much even, I was playing at home, won tactics, outshot them 46-16, even faceoffs, penalties were 6-1, and I lose 3-2.
At least it was Goldfish's superstar goaltender who led them to victory. I lost to HCD's backup goaltender.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts