Subject: Reporting bugs

Interesting... I still think that total points difference would be a more useful stat.

I don't disagree. But this is how FIBA does it, so PPM does it the same way

Agree, but "vlady" said somewhere some weeks ago, when I asked about it, nope, because that would lead to too many W.O.

Even if that was true, I fully think it would be the best -and fairest- option...

we are looking at that and there might be a bug with the in-game energy. if that's confirmed, we will update the engine accordingly next week.

Good to kmow my friend thank you.

I believe there is no such thing. Best team in Brazil is IV division. Watch the language.

I'm sorry, I was just disappointed with that kind of inequality.

Well, for the record, 9 of the 10 strongest teams in the world are from 1 or 2 divisions and only 1 is from 3rd division. How could that be a coincidence?
Also, I saw many teams that have several 310+ players, while my best player is, for only 290+. Again, how could that be possible? This just isn't right.

You should not evaluate the roster of a team considering that team´s OTR. A better proxy is team strength. Take a look and you will see divisions III and IV dominate.

Okay, I understand, but then how come this team basketball.powerplaymanag... which was registered only week before mine, has average rating better than mine team by almost 20(!) points. That's a huge difference! I mean, I doubt that even after a season of training I'll be as strong as him right now. So, is there any explanation to that?

You agree with me that this is another issue, right? So you also agree there is no point on the first matter you raised.

Concerning this other matter you just brought I have to say I do agree with you: initial roster was too different amongst teams. But that´s not a bug, that´s just an opinion I got. My team was one of the lower rated, but after around 1 million spent in the market I manage to balance the disadvantage. So I would say if your team was 1 older, you have 1 more week of earnings to compensate.

Please keep in notice that I do not disagree with what you just wrote.

Well, I suppose that the individual strength of the player adds up to total strength of the team, am I right? That means, that player's rating directly correlates to team strength. I mean, it's pretty obvious, isn't it? So in that case, I'm not sure, why some teams are given such a huge advantage.
As for buying players, I guess you're very good manager, if you've managed to balance the difference by spending only 1m, since for that kind of money in today's market I could only buy one ~300 player, with only few quality ratings over 70. That would still leave me far far away from those teams with several 300 rating guys given in the beginning.

OTR is not Team Strength!

Your team strength is only -1 compared to his. For example, my team has the lowest team strength in my league, 19 (active teams only, there are 5 TNNs), but I have a 10-2 record so far, without playing a single Very High or High quarter.

About OTR, there are mostly I.1 teams in the top of standings because the gain of OTR is different from level to level, more OTR gained for a win in upper levels than in lower ones. But they pay more for staff salaries.

I didn't log in for 5 days and lost my team, received an email yesterday telling me to login saw it today logged in and it is gone? I have gone more than a week without logging in on my football and ice hockey teams and nothing. Sorry I don't get it can anyone explain?