Subject: Discutii

Uite-te la meciul pierdut de mine cu fulgerul, cu 5 eliminati ce i-a invirtit pe teren...toate ratingurile sunt mai mici decit la alte meciuri...

La 1 punct +/- intervine CHE, Exp si energia

Exact astazi era mare zarva pe forumul american legat de relatia Tec/Agr. Eu am dat mai demult o relatie intre acestea si se pare ca am avut dreptate.
Daca ajungeti cu agr pe la 90, neaparat va trebuie macar 60 la tehnica.

PS: e vorba de frontcourt, bineinteles

Cu alte cuvinte min.Tec = 2/3 * Agr

+1
Am observat asta la toate jocurile PPM care au "agr" la jucatori si nu credeam sa fie astfel aici

in fine..eu ma bucuram ca am o PF adevarata in sfarsit.ca n-am avut nciodata..)..si indraznesc sa spun ca am doua..rusul e la fel de bun...

poti sa ne spui cat au la tec/agr? daca nu e secret

secret de stat

Jucătorul este cercetat Croaţia Vedran Bukić România T.A.T.Team, România I.1
Notă
25-26 zile...max 210

Atr AA Calitatea Informaţii diverse
Șut 32 57
Vârsta 16
Blc 37 73
Che 66%
Pas 32 71
LC perfect (6/6)
Teh 31 70
Înă 203 cm (6′7″)
Vit 57 89
Exp 5
Agr 77 95
Ene 89/98
Det 77 83
Pos SUB
SA 343 CM 77%
Pop

asta e venit de curand..si e mai bun..)

Jucătorul este cercetat Rusia Vladimir Skokov România T.A.T.Team, România I.1
Notă
16 sta...17 creste

Atr AA Calitatea Informaţii diverse
Șut 44 64
Vârsta 16
Blc 44 79
Che 13%
Pas 29 70
LC perfect (6/6)
Teh 32 77
Înă 203 cm (6′7″)
Vit 47 81
Exp 0
Agr 70 97
Ene 91/99
Det 71 94
Pos SUB
SA 337 CM 80%
Pop

31/77 = 40% si ar trebui sa aiba minim 67%
Cu alte cuvinte eu as duce tehnica cel putin pe la 52, adica 77*2/3+1

Nici eu nu as fi spus mai bine decat skeptimist )

PRO pack owner USA skeptimist [online]
[Report post] |
Reply
| 12.03.2015 08:03:01

In Ref to fluff79 comment. I've said it b4. TRAIN your TEC with your AGR. A player with twice the agr to tec is useless. I dont care if his OR is 400+...cant depend on a player that fouls out every game.

PPM should rewrite this part of the guide for newer managers.


PRO pack owner Romania mu3rt3
[Report post] |
Reply
| 13.03.2015 23:36:06

Reaction to: skeptimist (12.03.2015 08:03:01)

I think it's a relationship between Tec/Agr
min.Tec = 2/3 * Agr


PRO pack owner USA skeptimist [online]
NEW | [Report post] |
Reply
| 13.03.2015 23:42:27

Reaction to: mu3rt3 (13.03.2015 23:36:06)

I can see a 2/3 being effective. My comment was a bit vague, not to imply a 1 to 1 ratio. But what i commonly see on the market are centers with 34 Tec...80 agr.

I realize people have a different view on the guide, its open to misinterpretation but it does clearly state. Tec is responsible for lay ups & dunks., as well as dribbling / ball control. As minimizes fouls. Whereby shooting has ZERO effect on close range shots. NONE.
My personal center certainly isn't a good representation, but he doesn't foul out often, He also would have lead the entire Div.I league in rebounds this season had he not been hurt. This can also be attributed to a player that remains in games.

imi asum riscurile...nu urc mai mult de 50-55%..deocamdata..sa mai urce facilitatea de antrenament...

joci cu 3 de valori apropiate pe posturile PF si C si poa' sa-i elimine in fiecare meci...

Soveja, ales in echipa campionatului in liga III, II si I, SSSSi cu niste cifre excelente, in primii 5 la trei categorii acest sezon, are 49 teh si 52 viteza la 80 agr si doar 3,2 Faulturi per meci
Nu antrenez dupa o schema anume dar e clar ca exista o corelare stransa intre raportul respectiv si faulturi!