Time:
Log out
Subject: Questions & Answers| Select a country: |
|
International |
If all lines are equal and there is no more fatigue then I think i'm going to start playing 3 lines, because for all honesty why wouldn't I?!
there is no more seasonal energy loss. there is more current energy loss when playing 3 lines. during the game they will use more energy and be lower as the game goes on. due to being lower on current energy they will not train as well.
depends on how good your 4th line is and the factors i mentioned.
depends on how good your 4th line is and the factors i mentioned.
that is logic but i dont think that is included in this game
It is. Even players that dont play at all get most out of training
What you guys & girls think/see/know of this;
Wing Attacker with skills spread as 80 att, 60 shoot and 60 techn. Aggresness 20
versus
Wing attacker with skills spread 80 att, 60 techn 60 aggr and just 20 shooting
How is/should there performance in a game?
For whole season?
Wing Attacker with skills spread as 80 att, 60 shoot and 60 techn. Aggresness 20
versus
Wing attacker with skills spread 80 att, 60 techn 60 aggr and just 20 shooting
How is/should there performance in a game?
For whole season?
I'd think the second would be more valuable.
Aggression is needed by the wingers to get the pucks out of the corner.
The center is like a Sedin, afraid of the corners and getting the puck.
The wingers are Anson Carter.
Aggression is needed by the wingers to get the pucks out of the corner.
The center is like a Sedin, afraid of the corners and getting the puck.
The wingers are Anson Carter.
I would say the first. As i know shooting is very important for wingers.
hands down the 2nd one will perform better. Shooting is indeed a tertiary ability even for forwards.
I would go with #2 as well. I have a C with 16 shooting but a very nice C bundle and he still scores consistently. I also have a winger with 50+ shooting and a good bundle (except aggression) and he is inconsistent at best but still puts points up.
Make the 1st guy 40 agro instead of 20 and I'd prefer him to the second guy. As they are offered the 2nd is the more effective player. But I'd want his shot at 40 rather than 20 also. Also depends on who is on the line with him IMHO. Get 2 forwards with big pass and that shooter will see more scoring chances IMO.
My question.
Is pass needed for a winger to receive passes?
I have a winger who is pro-stuff in all stats except passing and he puts up very few points and very few shots.
We're talking like 90 - 45 - 45 with 50 tech.
Pass is low and he gets only a shot or two a game, with his other linemates reaching 4-6 shots.
Is pass needed for a winger to receive passes?
I have a winger who is pro-stuff in all stats except passing and he puts up very few points and very few shots.
We're talking like 90 - 45 - 45 with 50 tech.
Pass is low and he gets only a shot or two a game, with his other linemates reaching 4-6 shots.
It isn't considered part of their package.. much like shot isn't but it clearly helps their performance. Test it out. Test out a player add a bunch of pass to him and see how he performs.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 117ms / php: 74ms / db: 42ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 117ms / php: 74ms / db: 42ms ]
Web server: WB1