Time:
Log out
Subject: Reporting bugs
Sure thing.
One injury and/or one fresh sub shouldnt make such an impact anyway. But thats just my opinion, not a bug to fix. Case closed.
| Select a country: |
|
International |
Can you watch why my Erkki Lõhmus don't play and why play 3 lineups only when i order to play 4 lineups?
Dylan Cormier has been through UFA this season and will go to UFA again next season again at the age of 30. Bug?
No, at this age players only sign 1 year deals
At the age of 29 they sign 3 year deals, actually. It's only from the age of 32 when they sign 1 year deals. So it must be a bug. Or am I missing something here?
you got him 12 days before his contract expired because his team folded and he got on the market as an NT player. That must have messed up the usual cycle of things. Did he actually go through free agency? Did you have to pay the signing bonus?
I've got so many free agents, I don't remember how much I had to pay to keep him in the team. But the rules clearly state, that players don't become Free Agents at the age of 30. I wouldn't have payed that much money to get him if I knew that "cycle was messed up".
you can check the team news. I don't think he was a UFA this season.
I can't go back that far in the news. But it doesn't matter anyway. The rules are clear, otherwise why bother playing? Please change his status, or if not possible refund the money I payed for him. The player is worth nothing under these circumstances.
well I disagree. If you didn't have to pay a signing bonus this time round, it means you actually get out of this deal much better because his UFA status is moved back 1 season. So you can enjoy his services without paying a signing bonus for an extra season.
and I am 99% sure you didn't have to pay a signing bonus this season because the player was already on the market at the time when the system would have made him a UFA. The fact that he has a 1-season contract supports this hypothesis even more.
and I am 99% sure you didn't have to pay a signing bonus this season because the player was already on the market at the time when the system would have made him a UFA. The fact that he has a 1-season contract supports this hypothesis even more.
Well, I don't really get what you are saying and I have no tools to prove how much I had to pay him through Free Agency. But something really fishy is going on here.
thanks, we will check it.
Your favorite threads
Newest posts
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - All rights reserved
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 156ms / php: 77ms / db: 79ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contact - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Cookies settings - Site map
Advertising on PowerPlay Manager - Become our partner!
Partners: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 156ms / php: 77ms / db: 79ms ]
Web server: WB1