Tiempo:
Salir
Asunto: Questions & Answers| Selecciona un país: |
|
Internacional |
No worries Panther, I reckon that Tuesday is my last cupmatch. And the championsleague places go to the top 3 after play offs, right? No guarantee that the current top 3 will get to the semies of the play off. My team in particular looks vulnerable.
I'm kind of annoyed if all 4 lines get the same ice time.
There also isn't enough of a penalty to people who only roll 3 lines. They definately need more of a fatigue penalty over teams who roll 4 lines.
And like nsblues said, can we get vlady or a dev to confirm the ice time? If it really is equal then I have some changes to make to my lines and tactics.
There also isn't enough of a penalty to people who only roll 3 lines. They definately need more of a fatigue penalty over teams who roll 4 lines.
And like nsblues said, can we get vlady or a dev to confirm the ice time? If it really is equal then I have some changes to make to my lines and tactics.
It sounds like it has been confirmed by one of the devs already 
That pretty much sucks!
That pretty much sucks!
True, add it to the list eh?
right.
Got confirmation that apparently right now all lines are equal but PPM will be adding a function in the future where managers can adjust their time on ice.
No doubt the ability will either be a pro feature (which is fine) or a credit feature (which will be stupid).
No doubt the ability will either be a pro feature (which is fine) or a credit feature (which will be stupid).
Ok, so this means that engine has to be tweaked right?
While I agree that the ice time issue needs to be addressed I believe that the decision on whether or not issues like this should be a credit feature is a business decision, and shouldn't automatically be dismissed as "stupid". That being said, I also believe it should be part of the standard package.
i disagree. there are certain things that make sense as credit features (stadium design, player nicknames) and things that don't (assigning a position, pro screens). I agree with TB that this falls in the latter.
I do agree that the credit features are a business decision.. but it's people like you and I who have to spend the credits, so it greatly affects and applies to us, hence my comment.
If they can change effectives of some team by using lines unproportionally, then maybe it's also possible to reduce influence of random in one season.
I agreed that it didn't fit in the credit category. I just don't think when we disagree with the devs about whether somethnig should be credit or not it should be automatically dismissed as a stupid idea. None of us have intimate knowledge to make such claims.
Credit features should only be one time things.
What is the point of buying the Pro Pack if you need to spend credits continually for something else?
What is the point of buying the Pro Pack if you need to spend credits continually for something else?
Yep, my point exactly, which is why I was so outspoken when the automated marketplace system was going to be a credit feature. Why spend MORE money when we already financially support the game.
Just saying.
Just saying.
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios
Copyright © 2007-2025 - POWERPLAY MANAGER, s.r.o. - Todos los derechos reservados
Contacto - Condiciones Generales - Política de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del sitio
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Convertite en nuestro socio!
Socios: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 113ms / php: 76ms / db: 37ms ]
Web server: WB1
Contacto - Condiciones Generales - Política de privacidad - Cookies settings - Mapa del sitio
Publicitar en PowerPlay Manager - ¡Convertite en nuestro socio!
Socios: www.tennismania.com - www.biathlonmania.com - www.skijumpmania3.com - www.athleticsmania.com - www.wintersportsmania.com - www.summersportsmania.com
[all: 113ms / php: 76ms / db: 37ms ]
Web server: WB1