主題: Questions & Answers

How do you mean? that primary:secondary should be 1:1 and then secondary is divided according to how important they are?

something like that - but not exactly

Could be
pas - 38%, tec - 37% ...

Percent from what ?

Im so confused?

from 100% of secondary skills (pas, tec, spe, hea).
All secondary skills form one bucket (SA) and all primary (def, mid, off) forms other bucket (PA).

But I don't think that for every position we have relation PA/SA = 1/1 = 50%-50%

Look goalkeeper - he don't have any influence from def, mid, off - so his PA don't take 50%. I think that for goalkeeper there is 65% SA - 35% PA

SA = 35% tec - 35% spe - 15% pas - 15% hea - thats 100% from SA

So, overall skill should be:

65% SA and 35% PA
PA is 100% gol

And we have than:

35% gol
35*0.65 = 22.75 % tec
35*0.65 = 22.75 % spe
15*0.65 = 9.75 % pas
15*0.65 = 9.75 % hea

Overall = 35%gol - 22.75% tec - 22.75%spe - 9.75%pas - 9.75%hea = 35+22.75+22.75+9.75+9.75=100%

Uff
Just thinking

Never gonna happen...

Well, its nice to know, that the sum is always the same. But helps only a little bit. Many people trained already near this statement so its not the greatest help

The two big questions are still open. What is the ratio between PA und the sum of SA. Could be all between 1:1,6 up to 1:2,5. And what is the ratio between high, medium und low (not going to deep and therefor asuming that skills in the same row have the same importance)

That's what I wanted to say ...but Crashfahrer was faster ! If you don't have a relationship between SA and PA, all you wrote above is useless.

There I agree

@Crash
I don't know the ratio. I was just interpreting what Vlady was saying when he confirmed that the SUM of secondary skills is 100%.

Well, I made some calculations - and here it is how it could look if the ratio PA/SA is 50%-50% (only for GK not).

I don't think it is just like that - and that's why I am saying that ratio PA/SA isn't constant value.

img511.imageshack.us/f/ra...

best lack

yeah i understood this. but as i said, asuming a certain percentage for high, medium and low you were already near the same sum for each position, so Vladys statement helps not that much

Well - i think ratio goes from PA/SA = 42.5/57.5 for strikers and sweepers to 50/50 for central midfielders.

Why - strikers have only low def importance and central midfielders have medium def and off importance.

If you believe mid has a lower importence of midfield, are you suggesting they have def+off in their training aswell? Do you count that into PA or SA "bucket"?

Do stands, which building at the moment, take into account during "vandals calculating"?

Stupid question time.

I'm pretty sure center forwards used to have passing as a medium influence attribute in the guide, yet now it shows it as low influence. Was this changed, or am i going insane?