
選擇國家: |
![]() |
國際 |
100% of secondary attributes.
But does secondary attributes takes same portion of overall skills for every position.
Secondary(SA) = pas + tec + spe + hea = 100%
Primary(PA) = def + mid + off = 100%
Overall skills(OS) = X*SA + Y*PA
I guess for goalkeepers is different.
But does secondary attributes takes same portion of overall skills for every position.
Secondary(SA) = pas + tec + spe + hea = 100%
Primary(PA) = def + mid + off = 100%
Overall skills(OS) = X*SA + Y*PA
I guess for goalkeepers is different.
wait so does that mean that if you combine all secondary attributes it should be equal to the primary?
Well - that's the question
In that case X=0.5, Y=0.5 for all positions on the field.
But I think that's not the case. If you look the field you can see - on central defender there is small influence from offence and medium influence from midfield. But on the midfielder there is a medium influence from forward and medium influence from offence. So midfielder need bigger portion of Primary skills.

In that case X=0.5, Y=0.5 for all positions on the field.
But I think that's not the case. If you look the field you can see - on central defender there is small influence from offence and medium influence from midfield. But on the midfielder there is a medium influence from forward and medium influence from offence. So midfielder need bigger portion of Primary skills.
sorry
*on midfield - medium influence from offence and medium influence from defence.
*on midfield - medium influence from offence and medium influence from defence.
The guide says:
"two attributes in the same column don't necessarily have to have the same influence"
what does this exactly mean? where does it refer to?
a) is it guilty for the column of ONE player?
example medium influence, centre defender:
Heading > Passing > Technique > Speed
b) or in COMPARISON of TWO players with the same column. for example: passing is for side forwards more (or less) important than it is for side midfielders
c) both
"two attributes in the same column don't necessarily have to have the same influence"
what does this exactly mean? where does it refer to?
a) is it guilty for the column of ONE player?
example medium influence, centre defender:
Heading > Passing > Technique > Speed
b) or in COMPARISON of TWO players with the same column. for example: passing is for side forwards more (or less) important than it is for side midfielders
c) both
It means that togheter 2 secondary skills, like pass+tec for CM should togehter be the ratio number, say 70%. That means tec could be 65 and pass 75 and togheter they form the best ratio
It really first when swede says something that I understand. Thanks that now opened to me..
If that is true??
If that is true??
"two attributes in the same column don't necessarily have to have the same influence"
I think it means that in the same column there can be small differences between attributes.
for example goalkeeper:
Column 1: Technique 75, Speed 70
Column 2: -
Column 3: Passing 55, Heading 50
I think it means that in the same column there can be small differences between attributes.
for example goalkeeper:
Column 1: Technique 75, Speed 70
Column 2: -
Column 3: Passing 55, Heading 50
That's right.
That means - we have 100% of SA (secondary attributes).
For CM -
pas, tec - big influence
hea, spe - small influence
Could be
pas - 38%, tec - 37% -------> pas + tec = 75%
hea - 15%, spe - 10 % ------> hea + spe = 25%
so, SA= 75% + 25% = 100%
But that's constant SUM just for secondary attributes.
That means - we have 100% of SA (secondary attributes).
For CM -
pas, tec - big influence
hea, spe - small influence
Could be
pas - 38%, tec - 37% -------> pas + tec = 75%
hea - 15%, spe - 10 % ------> hea + spe = 25%
so, SA= 75% + 25% = 100%
But that's constant SUM just for secondary attributes.
I asked vlady "like central defenders have 4 medium important skills, but some are probably more important then others? But still, they together should form an avarage that is correct to the ultimate build?"
Got yes for answer so I do think its correct.
Personally I think that it depends where in the box you put your players (more off/def and more or less central)
Novakoni: I dont believe thats correct if I understand you correct, and i also think secondary skills are divided as 3 separate gruops (major-medium-low) and then each gruop has a ratio against the mainskill (def/mid/off/gk)
Got yes for answer so I do think its correct.
Personally I think that it depends where in the box you put your players (more off/def and more or less central)
Novakoni: I dont believe thats correct if I understand you correct, and i also think secondary skills are divided as 3 separate gruops (major-medium-low) and then each gruop has a ratio against the mainskill (def/mid/off/gk)
Well that's were I think we made a mistake.
I was looking for ratio against primary skill, but looks there is no right ratio on that side.
Now I think there is a 100% off all skills - and every skill take his portion from 100%.
I was looking for ratio against primary skill, but looks there is no right ratio on that side.
Now I think there is a 100% off all skills - and every skill take his portion from 100%.
你喜歡的遊戲主題
最新主題