Asunto: Questions & Answers

I have a bad energy but is that really the answer? Since my players still get good ratings and generates a ton of scoringchances it cant be simple that? Or does energy have a igger impact on the scoring possibilitys alone?

What do you mean by "bad energy"?

they have 81/78, but they still perform as creating chances and their ratings are still good right so why are they missing so much?

Just look at the Qfinals @ CL now;

I have 31-11 in chances, loses 1-2
Bubakov 24-13 wins 3-0
Iced Earth 15-12 wins 2-0
Kraljevina 31-19wins 3-2 after OT

Isent this a bit strange?

I just know from my own experience that energy have a very big impact.

Well, my boys have around 83-85, and seem to be too much.

Anyway, your ratings are still quite good; you had more possesion, and more chances. But most of them were out of target, so maybe some more technique is needed.

Finally, I don't see any real reason for you to be "worried". You have a good bunch of goals scored in your league, so that means those matches in CL are somehow just "bad luck".

If you'd keep on getting matches like that once and again, that indeed would be weirs

Typo: last word is * weird...

Btw, and EDIT button would be really loved

A players energy directly affects their attributes. I believe (but don't quote me) that the going thought is that for every 1 energy your player loses, you lose 1% off their attribute.

So, if you have a guy with a seasonal energy of 85, then his actual attributes are only 85% of what his actual attributes show.

This is why later in the season we tend to see a lot more "bad" game results.

ie. If a weaker team who has 95 energy plays a stronger team with energy of 80... which is actually the stronger team?

yes but my ratings still says my players are better then my opponent right? And they dont have 95 energy, maybe 5-10 higher at most.

I think you were penalized for low Individual skill in comparing with your Team strength.

Off course - you were better opponent, but Ind Skill and bad luck (some would say little bit of random) get you out of competition.

You say that and I would belive you in hockey but last year in soccer I played way more games on low to play the last few games on normal or high and was still crushed by lower teams with less energy.

I hear ya. I lost in a mid round of the NC this season in soccer to a much weaker team

Dont call them weaker or you will get an ear full from someone on what makes them lower I like to refer to them as lower since they have a lower team strength and lower then me in the standings. They have no arguement when stated in those terms.

EDIT: "...makes them lower" Should read " make them weaker" Where is my edit button!

Screw that, they ARE weaker.

If you take a WHL and compare it to an NHL team... the WHL team is weaker, no 2 ways about it. Same stuff happens here.

i belive energy has a huge impact on the field... look at these two games:

http://soccer.powerplaymanager .com/bs/sadrzaj-utakmice.html? data=20110328822

and

http://soccer.powerplaymanager .com/bs/sadrzaj-utakmice.html? data=2011047182

FK Ljiljani and Teslic Wariors have played most of their games on low so the energy is greater than 91-92 on average

while the other two teams have 80 or less than 80 energy, average.