Selecciona un país: | Internacional |
That formations all suck... best formations on football are 4-4-2 diamond or 2 line of four, 4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1, to use a 3-5-2 formation your defender have to be very fast and good at covering, its the kind of formation for counter atacks which suck ass, i prefer 100 times to see a team playing to win than to not lose...
Ahhh but what you fail to see is that my CMA is also one of my top shooters / scorers, and my 2 mid wingers are also high shooters, so i have more than enough offensive coverage.
Thats fine with me. But, that 3 players scored 6 goals this season (less than 10%). Rozitis 4, Nikolic 1 and Ritari 1. See? Not so productive at all.
That's because i've not been playing them in an offensive role this season.
id actually say that looks very normal for a team that is a major underdog. They only push forward on the counterattack.
Anyone had much success with the 4-5-1 in any variation? Obviously theres not going to be the punch of a 2 or 3 striker formation, but it seems to be a complete loser in this game.
In particular Im disappointed in the lack of success of the 4-2-3-1, which is quite commonly used successfully by a lot of large clubs.
In particular Im disappointed in the lack of success of the 4-2-3-1, which is quite commonly used successfully by a lot of large clubs.
I think 4-5-1 is good formation if you have have good lonely striker. I won league cup last season with 4-5-1 and since I have played all my games with 4-5-1.
As I said, he AINT superman or anything like it.. in other words, my team played pretty well with only 1 mediocre forward.
Temas favoritos
Ultimos comentarios