Nope. I should pay Stan a visit sometime. Or are you referring to the really old players in the game that have their contracts terminated? Hmmmm. Elaborate please.
Good old Boot Hill... maybe one day we'll learn the meaning behind the name. But for now we will just remember those who have fallen. Stan and company... I lay some e-flowers over your e-grave ... and maybe a "top shelf" magazine where "top shelf" does not refer to scoring goals but the location of magazines in stores and scoring own goals haha
It was named "Boot Hill" for 2 main reasons. It was the place where people who "died with their boots on" were buried (gun fighters, etc) and also because they were buried with their boots on so they would be ready to journey on the other side. In the old west, a mans boots were one of his most important possessions.
I'm not being funny Ciukitu, but 4-2-4 is not as uncommon as you think.
The positions in which your opposition placed his players looks strange, but thats ONLY where they start from.
He was at home and looked to attack you, he didn't do very well as the possession stats show, and you totally dominated central midfield.
But his defenders have good possession stats in that game and held your strikers at bay.
I would question more why my players didn't capitalise in this particular game instead of questioning PPM first.
I'm with you on that one. The midfield is key to winning... anyone who ignores that area of the field and loads up on CF and defenders should not win... there is no support for the transition game... just a game of kick around. I think if you attacked down the flanks you would have destroyed him.
I disagree with your first part of your post canucks.
Most teams with lesser ratings, in rl football would play a long ball game, hence cutting out their midfield.
Because there is not a straight answer I am asking AGAIN.
1. If I understand correctly when a substitute player (let's say in 80min) come into the game, he spend the same amount of SEASONAL energy as anyone else? If that is correct I don't see the point here. To me it's not logical.
2. substitutions
When will be available substitutions based on the RESULT? not based on time.