
Изабери државу: |
![]() |
Међународно |

"the high end pulls were better than the high end players, in the 200's"
Thats not it. I'm talking about improvement skills (0-100%). At this moment I don't care if I pull a player with 250 or 170 OR.
What I care is his progression and future use. If he trains at half the speed of my team average I have no use for him. I would only use him to make some money in the market. Even with OR=250.
I've seen a player with 300 OR from the SA. By I do think there should be a ceiling. Or the best teams would have a major advantage over the others. That's also why we should speak about atributes' values and not OR.
Hope you understand what I mean...
Thats not it. I'm talking about improvement skills (0-100%). At this moment I don't care if I pull a player with 250 or 170 OR.
What I care is his progression and future use. If he trains at half the speed of my team average I have no use for him. I would only use him to make some money in the market. Even with OR=250.
I've seen a player with 300 OR from the SA. By I do think there should be a ceiling. Or the best teams would have a major advantage over the others. That's also why we should speak about atributes' values and not OR.
Hope you understand what I mean...
The more you complain about pulls, the worse you will pull next time. I'm sure the devs are following this discussion and make a list of "people to treat specially".

Out of topic, but I really miss Stan's huge posts with double-researched and tripple-analyzed stats. He must be busy gathering new data.

Maybe your´re right
But I´m OK with that, because they can´t make it much worse


I have rarely pull good Q players as well, you just don't get them that often. If anything I see the weaker teams get the better q players so far, I always check my league info for the top AQ players in the league and it never seems to change, most guys are guys that the teams started with. I just don't see the huge disparity that everyone complains about.
Wow, one guy complains about aggression levels and before you know it I have to read through 3 pages!!!
lol...
So thats 1 guy out of...????
Anyways, as stated before, tech must be better than agg, especially for defenders as they normally engage the opposition WITHOUT the puck...
logic over yelling everyday for me,
lol...
So thats 1 guy out of...????
Anyways, as stated before, tech must be better than agg, especially for defenders as they normally engage the opposition WITHOUT the puck...
logic over yelling everyday for me,

Take a snapshot of your Players raised -page (Players => Scouts => Players raised). Lucky or unlucky?
Here's my top 10 pulls (sorted by AvQ):
img15.imageshack.us/img15...
Conviction: Unlucky
Here's my top 10 pulls (sorted by AvQ):
img15.imageshack.us/img15...
Conviction: Unlucky
Im in a pretty similar boat to you guys....
Here are my top 10 raised, some of which are my best players to date.
http://img691.imageshack.us/im g691/4687/playerstop10raised.p ng
Here are my top 10 raised, some of which are my best players to date.
http://img691.imageshack.us/im g691/4687/playerstop10raised.p ng
Just a question, If I play against a team that always plays offensive than it's a good idea to play defensive?
I'm better than that team, so I don't know why I should play defensive..
I'm better than that team, so I don't know why I should play defensive..
it's a counter-tactic, that's why you should play defensive, it has nothing to do with your team strength
Твоје омиљене теме
Нове поруке на форуму